Posts Tagged ‘Venture capital’

Podcast: Grow VC presentation at Sun, Sand and Startups event

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010
Google Buzz

On Thursday the 18th of Feb just few days after our launch, the second triple-s/Founders Lounge co-production by Sun, Sand and Startups group took place at the Gran Foc, featuring a talk by Jouko, titled “New funding opportunities for web and mobile startups around the world”.

Thanks to Kristian and his team here is the recorded podcast from the event. Below is some of the topics from Jouko’s presentation:

You can listen for the podcast below and you can also subscribe to Grow VC podcast via iTunes. Sorry for the occasional background noise and that it was cut short at the end. Again big thanks to Kristian and his team.

 
icon for podpress  Grow VC at Sun, Sand and Startups event: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

What stage should Startup proposal be, to post it to Grow VC?

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010
Google Buzz
337/365: The Big Money
Image by DavidDMuir via Flickr

Now that the long awaited core model is out, we are working on collecting questions and feedback from various blogs, emails etc. and are going to write longer and more detailed post to answer all of the important questions, but just briefly wanted to share this one question I just replied via email.

I’d like to ask you at what level should be a Start up proposal? I mean, an entrepreneur should present a complete business plan or can present just an innovative idea too?

My reply:

It can be at in any stage that you want, but it will need to be web or mobile focused business idea/model. However it’s good to understand that typically very early stage ideas are not so interesting “as investment”, but then again that “typically” comes more from the “old models of investing” and to be honest we have no idea what will become “typical” in our service, because that depends on the users.

Also note that all information you post into your startup profile in our service, is visible to all paid members (and early beta registrants that have their active role/profile), so I suggest you to read this post related on “idea level”

This will be very interesting to see, if entrepreneurs as “investors” will be different than “traditional investors”.

It’s been a big push to get this concept build and thanks to our great team it’s now out. It feels so great to finally have it out in the real markets and get real feedback. Now we can finally start to be fully open about our service and can continue to develop our service openly with you.

There is a lot to do and we are just getting started with all of this, so please share your feedback and questions in comments so we can get the dialog going here :)

BIG thanks for each and every one of you for being part of this exiting journey with us!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

How Grow VC works with traditional VC’s

Monday, February 15th, 2010
Google Buzz

Grow VC was created to fill a gap in the startup funding. Nowadays VC’s focus on more mature companies, and friends and family networks and local business angels are not a solution for everyone and don’t always support international business in the best way. Grow VC is the solution for early phase (less than USD 1M) funding. Its micro-funding model also helps other parties to make investment decisions, and its community can support startups and investors in many ways, e.g. to find experts, legal help, auditors, and find answers from peer groups.

When Grow VC now launches its full service, it soon starts to work with the traditional Venture Capital companies. For example, VC’s can “outsource” their seed funding to Grow VC and avoid typical problems for this phase, i.e. large deal flow that is difficult to evaluate, high costs to manage investments, and higher risk. Community Investment model will be used in the co-investment decision-making, and the Expert pool helps to observe companies that have got investments. This also gives a pole position for these VC’s to make investments during the following rounds.

Grow VC will publish more details of the model during the next months. We have already agreed the first VC’s partners for this model and also look for some additional VC partners to get a good global coverage for the model. This model is a unique opportunity for startups to get to work with VC’s in an early phase, and for VC’s this is an important opportunity to really work with innovate startups globally.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

“everyone funding startups” – Grow VC’s community funding model is launched

Monday, February 15th, 2010
Google Buzz

fee_splitCrowdfunding becomes a reality for startups

15th of February 2010 – Hong Kong – Grow VC today launched its one long-awaited core business model, a community funding model. Under this model Grow VC will pool 75 per cent of membership fees into a community fund that gets invested back into promising member startups. Community fund investments are managed by Grow VC, but all investment decisions are made by Grow VC members who determine how to invest their portion of the fund to other startup companies that they feel have the most potential.

Grow VC is fixing the inefficiencies of private seed funding for web and mobile companies with a global social network and crowdfunding. The service includes the tools needed for building a startup from the ground up, to getting funding at the seed level. It introduces startups to investors, experts and other entrepreneurs, helping them discover common interests and providing new transparent ways of achieving investment.

The community-fund feature includes a members leaderboard based on the merit of the members’ investment decisions. The most successful decision makers will be financially rewarded when the community fund begins earning return on investment (ROI). All decisions are completely transparent so Grow VC members can always view how successful past and ongoing investments are.

Grow VC cofounder and CEO Valto Loikkanen said: “Our model gets startups acquainted with the entire investment process and we are the first to offer this type of peer-to-peer crowdfunding. For our service to have a sustainable future, the cost structure must be kept low and our own interests must clearly align with our members’ interests – so that our success is dependent on the success of other startups, investors and experts in our community.”

Grow VC cofounder and chairman Jouko Ahvenainen said: “Early phase funding requires new solutions. VC’s are moving their focus to more mature companies, and LP’s are decreasing investments in VC funds. Entrepreneurs want to have more competition and transparency in the funding market, and business angels require better tools to find good startups and for easier dealmaking. This new model opens totally new opportunities in funding, and it also offers practical help like transparent term sheets and investment agreements.”

More about the community funding model

The model encourages entrepreneurs to start looking at other startups from an investors’ point of view, helping them to improve their own profile and communication. Through their funding process in Grow VC, startups can also build a global, multilingual and geographically distributed network of industry peers of Grow VC members, motivated to support their venture.

For early stage investors, or “funders”, the information that the community decisions provide about noteworthy startups brings a level of transparency not seen before in investing in tech, web and mobile startups.

The patent-pending community fund model is the original core innovation in Grow VC’s arsenal of unique funding models and the reason behind Grow VC’s inception. In 2009 the company was also the first to announce a global service-investment model, whereby service providers in the industry can invest in companies using work resources as “sweat equity,” in addition to money.

Joining Grow VC, and the basic features such as building a person profile, are free. Premium features including the services above come with subscriptions ranging from $20 to $140 per month, depending on how much money the startup company is seeking or how much the investor is looking to invest. For unlimited service investments, the monthly subscription fee is $90 per month.

Following its first five months in public beta, Grow VC’s community just reached 700 registered users from within the startup and investment communities.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

What is our market position?

Thursday, February 11th, 2010
Google Buzz
A social network diagram

Image via Wikipedia

Anytime a new player is entering the markets, there becomes a need to clarify “their market position”, ie. to try and figure out to “what box this belongs to”. Naturally this will be done by each individually, looking from their own perspective.

But, as we are about to launch our full-featured service, let me try to help and make this a bit easier for everyone and give some more insight to our own thinking about Grow VC market position.

Here’s what we are saying in our about page:

Grow VC is Venture Capital 2.0, bringing the first truly transparent, global, community-based approach to early stage funding. Grow VC can help mobile and web 2.0 startup stars secure initial funding for their businesses ranging from $10,000 to 1m USD. Grow VC will not only connect startup entrepreneurs with ‘funders’ (investors) to help them discover their common interests, but also provide tools for the process and new transparent ways of doing things.

Let’s talk this in more detail:

GrowVC_bgVenture Capital 2.0

This is pointing to where we started our journey. The big talk about the “Venture Capital is Broken“, the talk that the old models of Venture Capital don’t work for new business models. Therefore new business models need new funding models. Following the Web 2.0 model of communicating this we started to talk about Venture Capital 2.0

Truly transparent

This a big part of the the Web 2.0 and social networks. Things that were impossible to think of being public information in just 5 years ago are becoming public by default. To us, it’s only natural that this development will eventually catch up in a big way also in Business and funding startups are not going to be any different. Simply because there are much more problems involved with stuff that is non public information, if compared to being more open. Therefore, in our service, most of the things inside are transparent to everyone.

Global

When we talk about global we mean GLOBAL. We are not talking about “that thing” where you look outside from your own country – No. To us the global is being present in global community that lives at least part of their life online, where things are becoming more global than ever before. Because of the social networks people are really making the Internet “the only true global place in the world”.

Early stage funding

So, our position is not where there are working solutions available and adding efficiency to that would have very little impact, aka traditional Venture Capital. There where the need is several millions and where the cost and management structures are higher. Early stage is the segment where most of the problems of today are. Because of the new entrepreneurs entering to markets that are still learning the ways of startup funding and where the cost of managing, communicating etc. are high, but where also the new stratups are born.

For Mobile and Web  Startups

At least for now, we are focusing solely to web and mobile startups. The reason for this is that,

  • those offer some of the most interesting business (and therefore investing) opportunities
  • traditional VC don’t really fit to these in their very early stages
  • most of the Web & Mobile startup founders and investors are already living the “online life” and their footprints can be found around the web.
  • like ecommerce started from computer parts and grew from there we believe that new funding models for startups have best potential to start from web & mobile related startups.

$10,000 to $1,000,000 (that’s USD)

Yep, we even put a number to give a clear range to “seed funding” in our platform. It will be interesting to see what will become the real levels in the beginning and to where those will develop as time goes by.

Provide tools for the process

Now that we have outlined our market position, this is the actual part of what we are doing. Our first step is to move the seed funding process to online platform and provide needed tools to manage the process overall – and for each role to have their own tools for what they are doing in our platform.

Once we have moved the process online, we can continue to innovate and build new and better tools to get the process faster, easier and more efficient for everyone involved. Step by step.

So there you have our market position in more detail. After our launch we may need to add some points to this about our core feature, but most of it will remain the same.

Future position and cooperating with others

Naturally this is just our starting point and only the future will show, to what direction and how fast we need to develop our service.

Our position also leaves plenty of stuff around us that we can’t or won’t focus and we are more than happy to work together with everyone in the startup ecosystem to cooperate on all the things that help new startups. Some our own cooperating ideas we have already outlined, some are still just ideas and most likely, the best ideas will come from you!

So – we build and provide new tools and information to add efficiency and to make things happen faster, make stuff easier to understand and bring down the related costs while doing them. But while doing all that, we are going to only focus to the core problem of the funding process and look to cooperate with others on the related matters. So we look forward to join forces with accelerators, incubators, mentor programs, startup events, localized platforms etc., since our plan is not to star competing with things that are already working, but to develop things that make even those easier to manage and more productive for everyone.

We hope this “more detailed positioning” helps everyone to see “the box we fit” more clearly.

If you are working with startups and have an idea to cooperate with us, please contact us. We are happy to go through your  ideas and see if we can cooperate on those with you.

For those Venture Capitalist that are interested in the startups in our market position – Jouko, my co-founder will soon post about our plans in this area. – Meanwhile, stay tuned or contact him directly.

What do you think of our market position? How would you like us to evolve?


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

iPad and Apps Economy

Thursday, January 28th, 2010
Google Buzz

We all now know officially that Apple launched iPad. It is an interesting new concept between mobile phones and laptops. And definitely it will have and need a lot of applications to be successful. We saw already some games, books, and newspapers that are available.

iPadThe next step is to get developers to make much more apps. Paul Grim, a General Partner at venture capital firm SunBridge Partners, commented the apps business from the traditional VC point of view in Venturebeat’s article, An investor’s take on the iPad — how to parse the hype. In this article Paul Grim says:

Although I do believe there will be many successful apps on the iPad, I don’t believe they are generally venture-backed material. As with most of the iPhone apps, this will be a hits-driven business with little capital intensity; most of the successes will likely be angel or self-funded.”

This is the same point Grow VC has emphasized many times (like yesterday). We have actually divided the mobile startups now into two main categories (there are of course much more segments inside these categories):

  1. Hardware and more demanding technical platform startups
  2. Application startups

The first category includes companies that have been funded by traditional VC’s. But many of those firms also need seed funding before a VC round. The second category is not really for the traditional VC’s. But it doesn’t mean that they are not good business opportunities. But the capital structure and risk profile is different from VC’s targets. They can start with small money, and it is not technology risk, but much more market risk, i.e. can they really get loyal users.

This is one reason, why new models for seed and startup funding are needed. And we believe Grow VC’s concepts, which we have now in beta and especially new ones we launch in this year, will offer a new way to fund these companies.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Future of Venture Capital

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010
Google Buzz
Silhouettes representing healthy, overweight, ...

Image via Wikipedia

Today I was reading one of my favorite VC blogs AVC by Fred Wilson about “The Venture Diet is Working“, where he says:

2010 will be an interesting year. If VC investments go back up to $25bn to $30bn per year, then the diet didn’t stick and we are back to an overfunded industry that will produce subpar returns on average.

If, on the other hand, the new normal is $15bn to $20bn per year, then the diet worked and we’ve scaled back the business to healthy levels.

This comment relates to he’s earlier post about the “Venture Capital Math Problem“, where he explains about the problem that – too much money will make the whole VC industry to under perform.

As this is one of the reasons we have started Grow VC, I wanted to point out that things are not the same everywhere. So here’s my take on the topic:

I think this is similar problem than it is with food. In some western countries there is too much food and problems that are associated with that, like obesity. Yet in many parts of the world, people are starving.

So if some markets in the world have too much money in VC, it does not mean there is too much money overall, it’s just wrongly distributed. I do understand that, there are also problems with having too much money per sector, so that nobody is getting good results, but that too is wrong distribution.

Early VC money should always be going towards new innovation and not to be “me too in the popular segment” – there are plenty of problems in the world for entrepreneurs to solve & VC’s to be successful.

If we think that “Four Years After Founding, Kiva Hits $100 Million In Microloans“, I feel that it’s a strong indication that entrepreneurship in all shape and sizes can be instrumental on reshaping our world for the better.

There is a big gap between what Kiva.org is doing and with these problems of having too much money in venture capital in some regions. For us this shows that there needs to be much better distribution, more transparency and more activity in this segment overall – and this is exactly where we are focusing our efforts.

Here’s my dialog with Fred, on the “Venture Capital Math problem” 8 months ago:

Me:

I think this just shows that money does not solve problems. The problem here is not too much money, but how it’s now distributed.

VC industry is starting to look like the newspaper industry ;) – better to wake up, the blogs are coming…

Fred:

What are the blogs of the VC business?Things like Y Combinator are great but they are feeding us even more opportunities so I see them as additive, Although I also see blogs as additive for the newspaper business if they’d just see themselves as curators and aggregators instead of content creators

Me:

I guess the closest thing to “blogs of VC industry” today are angel investors. But that’s for today. Also Y-combinator and the likes are great too and could be considered as “blogs of VC industry”. However their “next step” need to change away from just VC’s.

The fundamental change will become, when there are “platforms” for anyone to start a “blog for VC industry” and that’s what we are doing in www.growvc.com.

Overall, we feel that in long term the money will be spread to more potential start-ups and more of them will not go via IPO but just buy back of shares, mergers etc. with lower ROI. But that’s OK if the time for ROI is shorter and cost of management is lower.

So – be more direct, spread wider, lower the management cost, speed up the ROI cycle and you can accept lower ROI.

If you think about the structure of today, from where the VC money really comes from, you start to see the “big picture”. – basically it means that individuals like you and me pay for pensions funds etc. and these funds then invest to VC funds. VC’s then make investment decisions and “manage” the investments, all the way to take it public (hopefully). Basically just to sell it back to us…

When more people will start to understand this cycle because of more info and transparency online (if they are interested), people will not accept this structure. Because in the long run what matter is, if the companies in question sell what matters. And that is not a question of size.

Fred:

Got it
I hope this works
It would scale much better

Related to this topic, below is a very interesting speech given by Fred Wilson at talks@google. You need to spare an hour to look the whole video, but I feel it’s well worth it. Just have some popcorn & coke and relax.

What makes it interesting to me, is that those industries that are going to be disrupted by internet in the future, currently have same issues what Venture Capital does, yet for some reason those would not apply to VC industry.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Asking for money?

Monday, September 28th, 2009
Google Buzz
Banknotes from all around the World donated by...

Image via Wikipedia

This is a guest post by: Brad Christen from CW Consulting

For startup companies, raising your first dollar is the biggest challenge: everyone is hesitant to place the first bet on a new company. Luckily, there’s a range of people out there willing to help – from investment groups and consultants to well-connected friends and registered broker dealers. But even if you’ve enlisted help in your search for capital, on many level you’re still going to have to be involved in the fundraising process.

And all too often, in spite of an entrepreneur’s passion for their project, they aren’t psychologically prepared to “ask for money”.

That’s quite OK, entrepreneurs should never ask for money. They are selling a stake in a new opportunity. They are inviting people to be part of an exciting venture. And they have to practice their pitch until it’s as familiar and unforgettable to them as a sit-com’s theme song.

There are three psychological tricks that entrepreneurs can employ. First, collect “no’s.” Make it your mission to hear the word “no” as many times as you can. Set a daily goal of how many times you want to hear it. Second, tell everybody what you’re doing. If a bank teller, a UPS delivery person or a pharmacist asks “how are you doing?” don’t say “fine.” Tell them exactly how much money you’re raising for your new venture. Third, build a movement. Replace “How many shares can you buy?” with “How many people can you find who be right for this kind of investment?”

The key is to stop asking and start telling. We’ve seen these tips transform entrepreneurs time and again. And we’ve seen how investors respond positively to entrepreneurs who have overcome any fear of rejection when it comes to financing their startup.

Are you still “asking” for money?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

The new era of ownership and funding: join the journey

Monday, July 20th, 2009
Google Buzz
This is a diagram of a Wikipedia:Peer-to-Peer ...
Image via Wikipedia

Wired published a couple of months ago an article “The New Socialism: Global Collectivist Society Is Coming Online”. To be honest, I don’t like too much the word socialism in the title. But if we ignore the word, this is really relevant article. And it is especially relevant for mobile and web related start-up companies and their funding.

Wired writes:

“We’re not talking about your grandfather’s socialism. In fact, there is a long list of past movements this new socialism is not. It is not class warfare. It is not anti-American; indeed, digital socialism may be the newest American innovation. While old-school socialism was an arm of the state, digital socialism is socialism without the state. This new brand of socialism currently operates in the realm of culture and economics, rather than government—for now.”

And it continues:

“Instead of gathering on collective farms, we gather in collective worlds. Instead of state factories, we have desktop factories connected to virtual co-ops. Instead of sharing drill bits, picks, and shovels, we share apps, scripts, and APIs. Instead of faceless politburos, we have faceless meritocracies, where the only thing that matters is getting things done. Instead of national production, we have peer production. Instead of government rations and subsidies, we have a bounty of free goods.”

And the writer has also some examples: “Who would have believed that poor farmers could secure $100 loans from perfect strangers on the other side of the planet—and pay them back? That is what Kiva does with peer-to-peer lending. Every public health care expert declared confidently that sharing was fine for photos, but no one would share their medical records. But PatientsLikeMe, where patients pool results of treatments to better their own care, prove that collective action can trump both doctors and privacy scares. The increasingly common habit of sharing what you’re thinking (Twitter), what you’re reading (StumbleUpon), your finances (Wesabe), your everything (the Web) is becoming a foundation of our culture.”

I think Grow VC could be one example in that list too. But I would call it as a new era of capitalism, where individual people and companies have better tools to work with other individuals and also have better control on their own life and businesses.

People don’t have be to a small part of a huge organization as it has been during the industrial age. But we still need models to work together and we also need owners and their control in companies. But openness, transparency and peer-to-peer models can make more effective capitalism.

All this is quite theoretical and abstract. Anyway, at Grow VC we believe that this new era of the web business also needs new models for funding and venture capitalism. VC business has been very similar the last 20 years. Our vision is to get it to support the needs of today’s new companies. Our global match-making service for investors and companies is the starting point. And all feedback proves that it is really needed. But I can tell it is only the first step on our journey to re-write the rules of venture capital funding. You will see a lot of other things during the coming months, how we think the funding world must also be renewed. And we talk about openness, collectivism, and co-operation; we want that all of view participate into this development. We want to get your ideas, comments and contribution to make this development possible.

This blog is one forum to discuss and develop concepts. If you register into the service, we have an internal discussion forum. You can also email us and you can develop components for the service.

How far you think crowd sourcing and collective actions, assisted by Internet, can take us in the future?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

One VC in Italy? No, two.

Friday, July 10th, 2009
Google Buzz

We met with Stefano Bernandi yesterday and had a really interesting chat about the startup scene in Europe. Stefano is founder of excellent blog The Startup and was just invited to become a blogger giving the Italian perspective to TechCrunch Europe, which has previously focused more on the UK and Belgium, and wants to start giving more local perspectives from across Europe. Hope it’s OK we mentioned that, Stefano ;-)

One of the many interesting tidbits Stefano had to share was the surprising fact that Italy has just two serious venture capital firms investing in tech startups. Yes, just two. The country is known for its limiting laws and it has had such an effect on the startup scene that there is virtually only a small tech community (primarily around Rome) and two VCs operating out of Milan.

Stefano’s got his finger on the pulse so if you’re interested in the emerging scene there, he’s your go-to guy. In fact he’s the blogger who broke the story about the launch of DPixel, the second VC firm.

At Grow VC we are dedicated to showcasing a global perspective, and as such, we want to start collecting more ‘go-to’ guys and gals from countries around Europe, Asia and the globe, or states in the US not necessarily ‘known’ for their startup scene (aka not the Valley). If you are a blogger with local perspective, and you don’t mind us syndicating some of your stories, please drop a comment and we’ll start tracking your stuff more closely and we’d be honoured to repost your stuff. As they say, local knowledge is everything.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark