Grow VC logo



Posts Tagged ‘Venture capital’

Weighing The Pros And Cons While Choosing The Right Funding Option For Your Startup
Wednesday, August 25th, 2010
Google Buzz

One of those make or break questions that you need to decide on which will impact the future of your startup idea or efforts “What is the best funding option for my startup?”. The decision doesn’t just determine how much money you have as capital for your startup venture, it determines the role you’ll play, the way you work and a lot more. Not surprising…it’s a question that needs some serious thought put into it before moving ahead. Here are just some of the pros and cons of the various private equity funding models you have available to you when you’re weighing your funding options:

Sweat Equity / Bootstrapping

Pros

  • You are and you remain your own man / woman. You are accountable to yourself and don’t have the added pressure of having someone else’s funds invested in your venture and the burden of their expectations to carry
  • Lower operating risk profile for the business since you’re relying on generating revenues and building cash reserves before re-investing it in growing further
  • You could end up building a leaner and most cost effective operation since you’re not used to having excess funds to throw at issues and make a habit of looking for alternative solutions instead
  • If it succeeds, you retain the largest possible share in your venture and stand to gain from it’s success or exit in the long term

Cons

  • Sometimes it could actually help to have advisors and the pressure of other investors in your business to keep the momentum of the growth
  • You personally stand to lose both financially and in terms of time if the startup fails so the personal pressure to perform is high
  • You risk a slower growth map since you are restricted by your own abilities to fund and execute on your plan and end up losing market share to others who have the capacity to move quicker
  • If your idea needs a significant investment right at the start then it’s unlikely that this option would be an option at all
  • You need a good track record and reputation before other join you in this mode. A bit of a catch 22 because many who rely on bootstrapping are also first time entrepreneurs and seasoned entrepreneurs look for VC’s or a form of Angel funding to speed up their growth.

Crowdfunding

Pros

  • More closely related to angel funding so those who invest in you do it because they believe in your idea or business plan. Effectively it’s a multitude of angel investors pooling together to give your business the financial push it needs. Relatively lower pressure while still having a healthy pressure of having to communicate where the business is headed
  • The investors themselves may not get directly involved with the day to day running of the business which gives you the freedom to operate as you will but you still have the option of seeking advisors and getting help from the community which has experts and mentors within it
  • You can raise enough money to support your business through its early stages while not so much money that you stop working in a resourceful and lean way and have money to spend on issues taking the easy way out rather than finding solutions
  • You can decide how much equity you want to give up in your business and how you would like to structure it and then list your proposal for the crowd to see and decide
  • You gain a large audience to begin with (in the form of investors). That way you could have say 10 000 customers when launching. Investors in your venture are also fans of your business and will help evangelize your startup adding ‘word of mouth’ marketing as an added benefit

Cons

  • Not suitable for very large capital intensive funding requirements beyond $1million or so and also for startups looking towards expanding in the growth stage through capital injection
  • The funding may be all you need to build your product, go to market and start generating revenues but it may only carry you to the next stage where you need to seek another funding round
  • You need to sell your idea and convince more than one investor in order to reach your target funding amount and it’s not a matter of getting one person to sign a check so campaigning is important in the process

Angel Funding

Pros

  • Angel investors can often make quicker decisions about funding and often invest out of their belief in you. They are more likely to invest at a much earlier stage while still only a concept than others
  • They often take bigger risks, they tend to have lower expectations in terms of rate of return or equity as compared to VCs
  • While some may take up non-executive advisory roles in the business, most would have a comparatively lower direct involvement in the way the business is run which is a pro so it’s less external pressure on the entrepreneur
  • Suitable for early stage startups that don’t need very large amounts of initial startup capital and grow the business to a level where other funding options may then be explored

Cons

  • May not be a suitable source if the amount of capital required is very large and the break even period is expected to be longer
  • The level of involvement may not be as high as VC funding for example and this can also be considered a con if more guidance and advisory is what you’re looking for
  • It is extremely important to be able to find the right angels. You must be able to live with those people, and typically entrepreneurs and angels are strong personalities. So if there is no match, it can make things extremely difficult. You should have enough potential angel candidates to be able to select the right one

VC Funding

Pros

  • Is more suitable for larger amounts of capital when the business is looking at growth and a significant amount of capital is needed to be injected in order to grow your market share and expand
  • VC’s will take a more active involvement with the management of the business playing a pivotal role in setting targets, milestones as well as advice on how to get there since returns on their investment is a primary lookout for them
  • They make the top rung of private equity funding so if you can find the right VC who will support your specific plans, you may have all the capital you need at your disposal

Cons

  • Perhaps not likely to entertain smaller investments since there is a minimum amount of they need to invest in high potential ideas so if you don’t need that much capital, you’re better off exploring angel or crowdfunding instead
  • VC’s don’t live only from the success of companies, but from the management fees and how much they own. So, it could mean a lot of dilution for you as an entrepreneur. Something to consider!
  • Since the VC are likely to play a more involved role in the direction of the business and it’s growth plans there can be a feeling of “loss of control” over your business or some compromise in the direction you would like to take it
  • VC’s can define your operations, as they may get a good position in your startup and may get to lay terms for your progress pushing you for the financial return. The exit may well become the primary focus
  • VC’s have a profile of the type of ventures they would like to invest in and would prefer companies that have some traction and would like to see more than just an idea before investing

Once you’ve had the chance to weigh the pros and cons along side your own objectives and business plan, you then have to ask yourself some important questions to understand what kind of a business model you have and where does it fit best in terms of funding options. But more on that later!

  • Share/Bookmark
Angel Funds Getting Smaller – Startups Becoming Leaner
Sunday, August 15th, 2010
Google Buzz

Clicking through a tweet by Alltop’s Guy Kawasaki lead to the discovery of this brilliant post by Dave McLure :

MoneyBall for Startups: Invest BEFORE Product/Market Fit, Double-Down AFTER.

Though the post comes with a disclaimer for those who are not up for a lengthy read, Dave has really hit the nail square on the head in terms of covering the current angel investment and startup funding scenario and it was well worth the read. Where is all this going?

The bottom line is: we are in the midst of a completely new era when it comes to startups one which has taken a 180 degree turn from how founding startups was done a couple of years ago. The dynamics of building a new innovative startup has changed considerably! The way the venture capital model that funds them hasn’t changed. It’s like trying to fit the tires of a Ford Model – T on a Toyota Prius. Not going to fit!

Grow VC caters to the early stage startups looking for smaller investments typically $100k to 1 million and the initial reaction of seasoned investors as well as a number of entrepreneurs is “what am I going to do with that?”. It’s barely enough or “what will other entrepreneurs who bagged $250 million think?” Does it really matter what they think? While understandably some business models may be capital intensive and need that kind of funding to get them running, most startups in today’s radically different era are far leaner than their predecessors and don’t need that kind of investment to become successful businesses. As Dave says as a summary to his view on how the scenario differs today:

So to summarize: PRODUCT development cycles are shorter, required materials & resources are free or low-cost, development teams are smaller, and new services mashup & build on top of old services that already deliver terrific value in the cloud via features, data, network effects, & APIs. MARKETing costs are lower, due to a variety of broadly-available, low-cost, online distribution channels, which can be used in more measurable and predictable ways than ever before. high-bandwidth to the home means video and other data-intensive media are commonly available to anyone with cable or satellite TV. REVENUEcan be generated simply & continuously, via direct business models & online payment methods that are becoming mainstream all over the world… such as mobile payments even in the remotest, poorest economies.

As the way in which early stage startups function evolves, the support infrastructure that supports them needs to simultaneously evolve with them to continue being relevant at the very least. If the gap continues, there will be more deserving startups that don’t get the support they need, more investors losing money through investments that go into today’s market through yesterday’s investment models and businesses who are spending more than they need to in the wrong areas.

There is a lot that can be done with a smaller investment under $1 million if the startup is operating in the nimble and highly networked environment that we have today. There are some fantastic companies who hire talent globally where they can find it within their budgets, make the network organization connected through the internet their offices, leverage cloud computing resources, the social web for marketing and turn out more profitable than a capital intensive one. What we need is smarter, leaner angel investors supporting smarter and leaner startups. The lean movement in startups needs to translate into a similar reform for angel investment with a more organized network through which everything remains transparent. We either move with the change or refuse to see it and get left behind a few years from now!

  • Share/Bookmark
Crowdfunding Will Never Work? – Food For Thought
Monday, July 19th, 2010
Google Buzz

Echoing the last post by Markus on our blog titled “The Power In the Crowd”, history has shown us whenever there is potential for a significant change in the way certain things have been traditionally done, there is bound to be skepticism and a sense of disbelief. The same applies to crowdfunding which has potential to change the way we look at venture funding and promoting startups which is bound to raise at least a few eyebrows among those who believe the current model is unshakable. We don’t have to look too far back to see how disruptive changes are met with a “that will never work!” remark only to change the perspective of people altogether.

Email came long and they said “this will never work! The postal services will never be effected by this!”

They were wrong

- MP3 technology and downloads started catching like wild fire and they said “This will never work! At least, the recording industry and music business is too big to be effected by it.”

They were wrong

Blogs and online publishing started gathering interest and they said “This will never work! The news networks, books and magazine companies can’t be touched by these amateurs.”

- They are wrong

Crowdfunding is now here and they say “This will never work! The venture capital system is the only specialized source for funding startups and how do they expect entrepreneurs to go looking for funding expecting to acquire them in $5, $10s and $20s?”

They cling on to the idea that a community of common folk can’t fund startups through contributions of $5s, $10s and $20s in startup businesses they believe in. Only a specialized large investment firm can raise the funds and cater to the needs of startups.

Here is some food for thought…

How do the largest public enterprises raise their funds or capital?

The answer is …….in $5s, $10s, $20s in the form of shares and stocks purchased by the larger community of common folk who invest a small part of their savings in businesses they believe in. Perhaps in a few years we can look back and say “They were….”

  • Share/Bookmark
Podcast: Q&A with Randy Mitchell from the US Government
Friday, July 9th, 2010
Google Buzz
United States Department of Commerce
Image by Steve Snodgrass via Flickr

Here’s something new for our listeners! Our guest for today, Randy Mitchell, Senior Advisor for Venture Capital and Entrepreneurship and Chairman of the OECD Working Party for Entrepreneurship in the US Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, was glad to take our questions and give us solid answers. Once we got to talking, the discussion could have continued and continued. Luckily for us, Randy offered to join us again, at a future date to build on our discussion.

If you want a good insight into our future, we strongly urge you to listen to the Podcast!

More on Randy on his LinkedIn

Listen to the episode in the player below or on iTunes.

Here’s some great quotes from the episode:

“.. there is an old model that has worked extremely well, in the tune of a billion plus dollars. That’s billion with a B..”

let us keep in mind that it is startups, it is new companies that are creating new jobs. The vast number of jobs created in United States are coming from these startup companies. So, if were doing anything to harm or impede startups getting going, then it is a very big issue.”

Here are the questions we posed:

  1. How do you see startup funding globally, what are the most important growth areas, and where are the biggest issues?
  2. Do you see any trends in global VC operations?
  3. What could the new models be to improve startup funding?
  4. How do institutional investors (e.g. LP’s) see the VC asset class nowadays?
  5. What role do you see institutions playing in supporting early phase startups?
  6. How recognized in the public/institutional sector, are these challenges in startup funding?
Enhanced by Zemanta
 
icon for podpress  Standard Podcast: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
  • Share/Bookmark
Virtual VC Co-Investment Model Launched
Thursday, July 8th, 2010
Google Buzz

Read the full press release here.

Yesterday, we launched an additional cornerstone to the community venture capital model. We see this step as one of many, toward creating a global funding community, with the proper tools to manage and cultivate innovations from all around the world. As several layers of funding institutions already exist, the idea has always been to utilize them together with prominent partners around the world, in creating a value-adding and more efficient operating way, to provide early phase companies with the right tools for success.

Keeping in line with the concept of creating a “Virtual Silicon Valley” and developing new models for more efficient early phase funding Grow VC rolls out the Virtual VC Co-investment Fund to enable VC’s to participate in Grow VC’s seed investments.

The first on board in this Virtual VC Co-Investment Fund is IndiaCo Ventures Limited, a profitable investment management firm listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange.

“The early stage startups space in India is an extremely exciting one and the virtual fund would open doors for VC’s to be a part of this promising market which has tremendous talent and potential given they get access to better funding options” states Rahul Patwardhan Vice Chairman and Managing Director at IndiaCo.

The development of our community has been at a great pace, yet we eagerly await the future where entrepreneurs have more equal opportunities in a global setting. Working with the actors that are passionate about building a better future, with a focus on entrepreneurship, we are confident we can unlock the tremendous potential in global startups.

  • Share/Bookmark
Are Student Run VC’s Outperforming the real VC’s?
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010
Google Buzz
USF_ IBPC_20107
Image by shawncalhoun via Flickr

I was reading this interesting article in ReadWriteWeb about the Oxford survey that examines student-run VC funds.

If there’s any truth in these numbers then these student run VC’s seem to be outperforming the Venture Capital asset class as a whole.

Altogether, these funds have invested in 36 companies and have had 5 profitable exits. The median initial fund size was $1.3 million, and today the median worth is $2.4 million. While one fund was associated with a college class and had over 200 students participating, the average had about 20 students involved.

If this is in fact the case, then I hope that the authors of this study do not get what they wish for:

According to the authors of the survey, they hope that the report helps increase the quality and performance of the student-run funds and that in response, the broader VC community will offer advice to universities which have these funds.

I hope that they would just keep doing what they have so far and leave the “advice” of the broader VC community to be used only in those VC’s own funds.

Some of the other conclusions from the study:

    1. No funds which have limited investment to only alumni of the university at which they are a part have achieved an exit.
    2. 38% of student led venture funds have achieved an exit. One fund has gone dormant.
    3. All funds list education as an objective. 46% of funds list returns as a major objective.
    4. Funds tend to operate as extensions of university’s foundation, independent nonprofit vehicles or as individual corporations.
    5. Student-led venture funds expect

      The whole study is available here (PDF)

      Enhanced by Zemanta
      • Share/Bookmark
      Playing The Idea Lottery – An Angel Investors Nightmare
      Monday, June 28th, 2010
      Google Buzz

      If you thought it was only entrepreneurs in the process of executing on a startup idea who spend sleepless nights tossing in bed …think again! So far we may have covered a lot on the challenges they face in setting up their ventures and managing the often challenging process of finding the funding they need but that isn’t to say the only drawbacks of the current way of doing things come from venture capital firms and early stage private investors. Entrepreneurs have also been guilty of certain “not so good” practices for which investors have to spend sleepless nights tossing and turning in bed thinking about where their investment is going next. One such practice by entrepreneurs is playing the idea lottery.

      Investors may buy into a startup with a good idea but what they really like to see is passion, focus and execution on the idea with a single minded aim to make it work. Some entrepreneurs on the other hand believe it’s all about the ideas and the ideas only. Their objective becomes coming up with the next big idea they can sell ….till the next new idea comes along that is. In search for the next Google it becomes a process of selling one idea and then flipping to the next in hope that “this” is the one that will create instant success. Those random situations where the idea is an immediate success, are dream cases for all parties involved. But this is a one in a million scenario and even Google didn’t happen overnight. Playing the idea flipping game or the startup lottery, where the startup is killed with the old idea and new startup is created around another idea, is an investor’s nightmare. It’s something they would rather not see. In fact, every investor would like to see their investment create some real tangible value.

      While completely flipping ideas altogether is a bad idea, startups have to be able to adapt and “pivot” their idea, while keeping the startup alive. The next Google’s are seldom the first idea from that team, but maybe it will start to form once they’ve had more interaction with customers, developers and have tweaked it all over. So the idea being pitched counts, but it’s not as if that idea will be unchanged after six months, of three years. Contrary to complete changes in the main idea, investors actually like to see this kind of adaptability and insight in the people they invest in. That’s right….investors like to invest in people and not into the idea. All things being equal, a good team and an average idea is what an investor would bet on rather than a great idea and an average team. Also, they would like to see that their idea/team is in the right position within the overall market growth that is tied well to megatrends that will impact everything. That is the path to the BIG potential.

      As investors the secret formula you’re looking for is

      Great Team + Great Idea + Right Positioning In The Market + Market potential + Tied Well To A Megatrend(s) Which Could Effect Big Changes

      This is also where Grow VC fits into the equation helping ensure one goes through a process where they can ready themselves for “going BIG”.

      A veritable checklist to equip entrepreneurs:

      1. Great team? – OK!
      2. Great idea? – OK!
      3. Early enough? – OK!
      4. Market? – (approaching big growth curve or extreme disruption/reorganization etc.) – OK!
      5. Mega-trends? – (globalization, Internet changes everything, etc.) – OK!

      As an entrepreneur you have be able to put yourself in the investors shoes and ask yourself “would you be willing to invest in your team?” and if so, “why?”. If your answer is “because it’s a fantastic idea!” then remember, investors don’t like to play the idea lottery. It’s their worst nightmare. If you answer “because you have what it takes to stick to your plan and build real value”, then you’ll find people willing to back you up all the way.

      • Share/Bookmark
      Crowdfunding in the Global Media
      Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010
      Google Buzz

      It seems that crowd-facilitated solutions are becoming more and more topical, and not just for us, but also for the global community. This of course refers to the media and we’ve got some great boosts from many different instances. The newest ones are from the Times of India, Mashable and ReadWriteWeb.

      Mashable did a story on crowd-facilitated solutions called “HOW TO: Crowdsource funds for causes, creativity and startups“. Grow VC was depicted as the more “serious” funding solution, which we obviously graciously accept and gladly also reinforce. The market is getting more and more ready for a serious solution, which we will obviously provide. The whole article is available on Mashable.com.

      Mashable also featured Nick Christy, from the community and his cleantech startup CINTEP. The company CINTEP, that manufactures showers that consume 70% less energy and water, has a commitment to crowdsourcing and has taken great initiatives in making it a reality. For example, see CINTEPs Homepage and it’s crowdfunding section for investors. Heads up, they’ve just opened their first funding round!

      The Times of India wrote in their article “Leading the mob” about crowdfunding, on many different levels. It’s a good coverage of different solutions and it demonstrates how new funding alternatives can truly function on a global level, creating more equal opportunities for entrepreneurs. It also contains suggestions and indications to some future news that we at Grow VC will happily announce soon, so make sure you read it! The article is available in full-length here.

      ReadWriteWeb also pointed out that Grow VC is the only solution that does due diligence on the startups, making them more likely to succeed. Building a nourishing community of inspired people is a longer term vision for identifying and deploying amazing startups on their paths. We believe in empowering the community to develop successful ventures and succeed together with its members. You can read the full article here.

      Enhanced by Zemanta
      • Share/Bookmark
      Podcast: The Broken VC Model
      Friday, June 18th, 2010
      Google Buzz

      With the delicately provocative title, this episode focuses on the need for development in the VC model with discussants Jouko from Grow VC and our friendly expert Kevin Lawton from Trendcaller among various other roles. Listen to the episode for some real insights in venture capital, but most of all the direction we’re going and what possibilities and opportunities are present for us. Many strong messages for startups!

      Listen to the Podcast in the player below or on iTunes.

      “The skill-set of Venture Capital firms is shown by their performance”
      - Kevin Lawton

      Here’s some points from the Podcast:

      Kevin gives an overview on his activities

      Member Highlight: Finderbase

      Situation in the funding market in Silicon Valley

      • “things are going to get worse”

      Where to put your money?

      • “I think pigs were flying a few years back, during the dot-com bubble”
      • Venture Capital’s been broken for 20 years

      VS’s will start to look more like startups

      • Lean VC model
      • Financial Friction of VC’s

      Crowd analogy to “Who want’s to be a millionaire?”

      Virtual VC firms

       
      icon for podpress  Standard Podcast: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
      • Share/Bookmark
      Too Old To Bootstrap Too Young For Venture Capital Firms
      Friday, June 11th, 2010
      Google Buzz

      The point in time when most entrepreneurs find themselves in a dilemma about how to move forward their ideas. It’s at this particular time when they find they have been running with their idea bootstrapped and they have run as far as they can on their own pockets and they will need the financial backing to run the next few miles. Yet when they put on their well-pressed suits, polished their elevator pitches and head off to the VC firms with their ideas they are told the idea is great but “we need to see a working model and revenue stream”.

      A little too often entrepreneurs look at VC firms as the “holy grail” of building a successful business. The amount of funding can become the ultimate objective and take focus off what is really to be achieved. Often moving towards getting VC funding like a horse with blinders on they can lose track of who else is around them that can help. It’s almost as if the success or failure of the business depends on the “yes” or “no” the VC firm will declare based on the pitch. Not only does that put excessive pressure on the startup where it’s not quite required, but it confuses the priorities at this stage for the entrepreneur. Rejected by VC firms who find the idea a little too premature to invest large sums in to and finding it pointless to pursue without being able to inject a little capital into getting the business started, this is often a breaking point for many great ideas and the point where some early stage startups may even …breathe their last.

      Fortunately (for those who gasped at the last line) this tragic end need not be the end at all for early stage startups with the development of the VC 2.0 and crowdfunding investment models. In fact this is the very segment of entrepreneurs who can benefit from the Grow VC platform and look to secure funding for their businesses. The community approach can really help challenge your views and help create well rounded perspectives on your ideas ultimately producing more healthy and successful startups. Rather than being blinded by the purely “money” side of growing the business it drives you to think out of the box and develop a “smarter business”.

      For those who find they can’t continue to bootstrap if they are to go live, build up some customers, build their applications, kick start their marketing efforts or other activities needed to grow their business, this is where they can find their capital whether human or financial. A place where they can gather not just finances but wisdom, experience, talent and strengthen their business models.

      Assuming they don’t absolutely need the $15 million or so from a VC firm to proceed, they can raise a smaller amount up to $1 million through crowdfunding. This can help them grow and build a profitable business taking them to the stage when they can confidently secure larger investments from the VC firms who will now see them as “old enough” to be attractive investment opportunities.

      The crowdfunding model could play a critical role at this point in the life of a startup with the community coming together to contribute in startups they believe in while addressing a serious gap in the existing seed funding market. You may be too old to bootstrap, you may even be too young for a VC firm but you can never be too young for the global community of investors on Grow VC.

      • Share/Bookmark