Grow VC logo



Posts Tagged ‘VC 2.0’

The New York Times: Do We Need VC’s
Sunday, May 17th, 2009
Google Buzz

The New York TimesThe New York Times asks today “Do Web Entrepreneurs Still Need Venture Capitalists”. Robert Hendershott, a professor of private equity and entrepreneurship at the Leavey School of Business at Santa Clara University, says that venture capital is becoming obsolete, because the cost of starting a Web company decreases, thanks to cloud computing services and technology that entrepreneurs can rent instead of buy, many founders can finance a new company without the help of venture capitalists, using their savings, money from family and friends and credit card debt.

paidContent.org listed some opposite opinions. Boring to say, but I think both of them are right. Web companies can be started with small money. They still might need VC money in later phases, but we have now a problem in early phase funding from VC’s. Private investors or angels can also be professional and help company as VC’s. And it is not guaranteed that all VC’s can really help start-ups. There are some top level VC’s and a lot of totally useless. We must also remember that companies can get professional help from other sources than VC’s, you don’t necessary need VC to make an exit. I think we see changes in the whole ecosystem. And it is not only one solution that fits to all companies.

  • Share/Bookmark
Forbes: Risk-averse VCs
Saturday, May 2nd, 2009
Google Buzz

CashForbes’ article is a good summary of VC’s dilemma: VC’s want to be larger and avoid risks. Forbes says: “Venture firms raising ever-larger investment funds–which produce ever-larger fees, of course, and rich lifestyles for the VCs getting them–have simply backed too many crummy companies over the last 10 years.” And it continues: “Geoff Love, whose U.K.-based Wellcome Trust is an investor in many top VC brands, said onstage at the conference that he thinks larger funds and fees have made many venture capitalists more risk-averse.”

I think this is nothing new for people who are working in start-up and VC business. But it once again highlights many relevant issues. And especially this is a problem for early phase web and mobile companies. They need smaller money to prove that they can launch a beta version and start to get users and market feedback. During the last six months I have talked with several people who are launching their new web or mobile service and they have been interested to get investors. My advice is to find smart business angels and/or try to make it with so small money as possible, get users, and learn how the business model works. But of course all entrepreneurs haven’t enough money to do it without external investors.  Hopefully Grow VC can help them soon.

  • Share/Bookmark
Regulation vs. transparency
Tuesday, March 24th, 2009
Google Buzz

regulatorPeople and media want to get more regulation to the finance sector. And politicians, of course, promise to do it. And many cases demonstrate that the existing regulation hasn’t work properly and many innocent people have lost their money. But I think the question is, whether we need more regulation, or better regulation, or more transparency. Often more regulation also means more complex structures that are more difficult to control and understand.

Hedge funds, different kind of derivatives, and several other new instruments are complex to understand, measure, and manage. And especially for investors they are like black boxes. One day they bring a lot of money, and another they take all your money. I believe there will be always new instruments in finance, we cannot stop it. But should regulators actually focus to support more transparent and open ways to make investments.

Peer-to-peer finance is a good example of openness. It can mean micro-loans, peer-to-peer lending, and open platforms to finance companies. It is not risk free. But it has much less complexity to understand and manage. People can also see, where is their money, and also understand their personal risk better. And if one company fails, it doesn’t cause a huge chain effect. Of course, all people are not willing or able to manage their own investments, but more and more people are able to do it, and willing to do it.

An issue is that more regulation can actually make this kind of transparent model more difficult to implement, because more regulation can mean more complex structure requirements, more control structures, and much higher costs. I really hope that politicians and regulators around the world understand this issue. The internet, more educated people, and general requirement for openness (2.0 world) should also mean more transparency in the finance sector. And the regulation should actually support to create more open and simpler finance instruments and models.

  • Share/Bookmark
2.0 Business – how to get money
Wednesday, February 18th, 2009
Google Buzz

I was speaking in Mobile World Congress in Barcelona yesterday. It was a session about Mobile 2.0 Business including many interesting start-up firms and big names like Google. It was the most popular session in MWC so far in this year. People really start to understand the meaning of 2.0. One topic I covered was a need for new funding models that are also linked to new models to monetize 2.0 and especially social media. I share here some main points:

2.0 is doing together and sharing

  • Co-create, co-develop, co-funding, and co-succeed
  • It’s about individuals, conversations, and communities
  • High transparency

2.0 enterprises ARE NOT new technology enterprises

  • New business models
  • Help people to do things together
  • Funding and earning models Challenges

Don’t under-estimate the importance of funding and revenue!

  • Social media has good opportunities to monetize services, but it cannot use old models to do it
  • Same with funding
  • New models are needed

New funding models like Grow VC

Investors from around the world

Direct or Community investments

Long tail of investors

  • Can also bring old models, like co-operatives, back
  • Co-op communities can mix sales and funding: owners get benefits

Total transparency

  • Not only to evaluate companies, but investors too
  • Share/Bookmark
Forbes: “Entrepreneurs and venture capitalists need to bridge their gaps”
Friday, January 30th, 2009
Google Buzz

Forbes writes about the same issue, why we are working with Grow VC. The key issue is to get right people to find each other. And there must not be artificial barriers or filters. It doesn’t really matter whether we talk about biotech, semiconductors, or web 2.0. And if all investments are controlled by few business angels who understand the business they have done earlier or VC’s with some Excel experts, it is not enough for all innovations and start-ups. I don’t say that there is anything wrong with top level business angels or VC’s, I just say it cannot be the only solution.

  • Share/Bookmark
Breaking Through The Broken
Thursday, January 29th, 2009
Google Buzz

grow heroFew days back I got an email from Chris Mottau at North Venture Partners. In his email he says that “he feels, we share the same vision” and that he became very excited about what we do;  “I love the mojo of your blog” – in his words.

He also wanted to share their new guidebook called Breaking Through The Broken: The Transparent Guide To Overcoming The Inefficiencies In Early Stage Venture Capital. -saying that he thinks I will like it.

Sure enough, I really did. It’s well written, up to date, quality piece (33 page of reading) and it’s really good overall view to current funding climate and to various problems that exists. What I really like about it personally, is that it does covers many of the latest and new emerging services that are trying to help change things in these currently broken models of early stage funding.

I asked if I can highlight some of my favorites from this piece in our blog and he said: “I’m glad you enjoyed the document, feel free to share it on your blog…it represents a good deal of work for us of which we are very proud”.

So here are some of my personal favorites:

Early stage investing will always be considered a high risk, high reward game. But what if there were smarter, more efficient tools that enabled both investors and entrepreneurs to optimize the process by making the investment process “less gut” and “more guided”? Could we eliminate some of the fear and confusion surrounding early stage investing and begin to truly optimize entrepreneurship?

————

This all raises the question; what is the early stage investor community currently doing to optimize entrepreneurship and increase the success rate of their investments?

————

On one side there are the mysterious “deal makers” who might seem easy to reach with the click of a mouse, but in reality are incredibly difficult to engage with meaningful dialogue. On the flip side, there are the passionate entrepreneurs who are eager to find out what an experienced investor thinks of their “big idea,” but usually hear back nothing at all after submitting their materials for consideration.

————

Start-ups are now cheaper to launch than ever before, as $500K has become the new $5 million. Primarily because basic software that was once absurdly expensive is now free (open source), and astonishingly good hardware (or virtual processing power) is now very affordable.

————

To change our future we need to re-think the past. Moving forward into  an era of collaboration and transparency isn’t just a nice idea; right now it’s an imperative.

————

The cold fact is that most investors still won’t even glance at a business plan unless it’s gotten a referral from a credible third party. It’s not only about who you know, it’s also about how you know them. Entrepreneurs and business plans referred by others who have proven to be good filters for garbage ideas, often float to the top of the pile. How else do you expect investors to filter through 34 years of reading material? Everything else usually gets dumped into the circular filing cabinet. Today most investment deals come down to personal TRUST, which is pretty hard to create in a virtual world.

————

“The real issue is that getting financing is difficult and inefficient for the investor. I’m having to create a whole slew of personal relationships, networking, etc… – just to get small amounts of money. While I like being social and getting out there, it’s slow. We need a Wal-Mart model for “common’ money” (i.e. under $500k using a typical business model). The real issue is that many people could be funded so much more efficiently, with better returns, if the industry was more transparent.” – Adam Nelson, Founder of varud.com

———–

“With Angelsoft, all of the personal aspects of Angel investing seem to be removed from the equation. My materials are submitted through Angelsoft forms, and then disappear into some system that encourages a group of busy angels to evaluate the opportunity in a black box. Do they like it? Do they hate it? Do they even read it? I have no idea, since I have never heard anything!” – comments a disappointed entrepreneur.

———–

Remember, investors (like Hollywood studio executives) see and hear of thousands of deals a year and have very little time to spend on them. If your idea doesn’t fit into their “box of knowledge”, it’s going to be quite difficult to break through and earn a second meeting. If you can’t narrow down your business to a sticky single sentence, you’re probably not ready to get in front of an investor anyway.

———–

Paul Graham, a prominent Silicon Valley entrepreneur and Angel investor sums up the feeling of many entrepreneurs when he said, “VCs that suck less are all about disclosure and transparency.” To truly produce fundamental change and foster innovation it’s time for investors to allow entrepreneurs to see the world from their side of the table.

———–

Note: one other insight that can be pulled from the real estate market is the standardization of deal documents and terms. The liquidity of real estate hinges upon the simplicity of the standardized paperwork. Just imagine the efficiencies that could be gained from standardized deal terms in early stage venture investing.

Like said these are just some of my favorites from this great guidebook. Make sure to read the whole “Breaking Through The Broken: The Transparent Guide To Overcoming The Inefficiencies In Early Stage Venture Capital.” It’s really worth it. And please, make sure you let us know how you like it.

Thanks Chris for sharing this.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark
Who are business angels – how to make angel investing work better
Tuesday, January 6th, 2009
Google Buzz

Scott Shane has written an excellent book about angel investing: Fool’s Gold, The Truth Behind Angel Investing in America. It is the best and most fact oriented book I have seen about the angel investing. Many finding are really revealing. They are from the US, but based on my own expriences I believe results would be similar in Europe and Asia too. For example, actually business angels look very different from the way that they are described in the media. The typical business angel is less wealthy, less well-educated, younger, and less likely to be retired that suggested by the stereotypical description of angels. For example, the wealth statistics are interesting, 2/3 of the angels have less than $1 Million net worth. It very much indicating that almost anyone can be a business angel.

The book also list many different reasons to invest:
1. To Make Money
2. To Get Involved with Private Companies
3. To Learn New Things
4. As a Hobby Job
5. To Find a Job
6. To Help the Community
7. Because a Friend of a Friend Has a Business

I recommend this book to every one who wants to make angel investments or entrepreneurs who look for angel investors. This book also gives many concrete ideas, how to develop angel investing. Angels can be an important source of money for many companies, and the total value of annual angel investments is greater than VC investments. But angel investments could be even more important funding source, but all players like entrepreneurs, angels, banks, VC’’s and policy makers should better understand facts of angel investing.

My conclusion was that more open market place, better deal flow, better transparency (to know companies but also investors better), and opportunities to co-invest with other angels are important areas to make angel investing work better. Angel investment market today is not effective (i.e. not enough transparency, no open deal flow, high transaction costs) and by making it more effective, we can make it much more significant.

  • Share/Bookmark
2009 Trends
Thursday, January 1st, 2009
Google Buzz

It is again time to predict the new year. Wired has listed some technology trends for 2009. American National Venture Capital Association has predicted 2009 VC environment. Their approach is of course very much based on the traditional VC model. I think we can all agree that 2009 will be difficult year to get VC funding. But at the same time many entrepreneurs continue with their business ideas, many people lose their job and at least some of them have excellent ideas to create new business, and they have also learned how to make things in a better and more effective way. Internet and Mobile services are developing rapidly, and I believe this kind of environment really boost 2.0 services. So, definitely a challenge for these entrepreneurs is to get funding, not so much, but let’s say 50k to 300k to get service up and run and survive somehow.

I think this is the challenge that all of us, entrepreneurs, private investors, and people who want to be involved in new businesses, must tackle together in 2009. We must work together to find models that people who want to create new can find new models to work and also get funding. This is one key mission for Grow VC in this year, but this is something all of us must do together. We are a community that learn together and find new ways to do things. Definitely a part of this process is that Grow VC service for funding will be launched in this year.

  • Share/Bookmark