Posts Tagged ‘transparency’

Podcast: Grow VC presentation at Sun, Sand and Startups event

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010
Google Buzz

On Thursday the 18th of Feb just few days after our launch, the second triple-s/Founders Lounge co-production by Sun, Sand and Startups group took place at the Gran Foc, featuring a talk by Jouko, titled “New funding opportunities for web and mobile startups around the world”.

Thanks to Kristian and his team here is the recorded podcast from the event. Below is some of the topics from Jouko’s presentation:

You can listen for the podcast below and you can also subscribe to Grow VC podcast via iTunes. Sorry for the occasional background noise and that it was cut short at the end. Again big thanks to Kristian and his team.

 
icon for podpress  Grow VC at Sun, Sand and Startups event: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

“everyone funding startups” – Grow VC’s community funding model is launched

Monday, February 15th, 2010
Google Buzz

fee_splitCrowdfunding becomes a reality for startups

15th of February 2010 – Hong Kong – Grow VC today launched its one long-awaited core business model, a community funding model. Under this model Grow VC will pool 75 per cent of membership fees into a community fund that gets invested back into promising member startups. Community fund investments are managed by Grow VC, but all investment decisions are made by Grow VC members who determine how to invest their portion of the fund to other startup companies that they feel have the most potential.

Grow VC is fixing the inefficiencies of private seed funding for web and mobile companies with a global social network and crowdfunding. The service includes the tools needed for building a startup from the ground up, to getting funding at the seed level. It introduces startups to investors, experts and other entrepreneurs, helping them discover common interests and providing new transparent ways of achieving investment.

The community-fund feature includes a members leaderboard based on the merit of the members’ investment decisions. The most successful decision makers will be financially rewarded when the community fund begins earning return on investment (ROI). All decisions are completely transparent so Grow VC members can always view how successful past and ongoing investments are.

Grow VC cofounder and CEO Valto Loikkanen said: “Our model gets startups acquainted with the entire investment process and we are the first to offer this type of peer-to-peer crowdfunding. For our service to have a sustainable future, the cost structure must be kept low and our own interests must clearly align with our members’ interests – so that our success is dependent on the success of other startups, investors and experts in our community.”

Grow VC cofounder and chairman Jouko Ahvenainen said: “Early phase funding requires new solutions. VC’s are moving their focus to more mature companies, and LP’s are decreasing investments in VC funds. Entrepreneurs want to have more competition and transparency in the funding market, and business angels require better tools to find good startups and for easier dealmaking. This new model opens totally new opportunities in funding, and it also offers practical help like transparent term sheets and investment agreements.”

More about the community funding model

The model encourages entrepreneurs to start looking at other startups from an investors’ point of view, helping them to improve their own profile and communication. Through their funding process in Grow VC, startups can also build a global, multilingual and geographically distributed network of industry peers of Grow VC members, motivated to support their venture.

For early stage investors, or “funders”, the information that the community decisions provide about noteworthy startups brings a level of transparency not seen before in investing in tech, web and mobile startups.

The patent-pending community fund model is the original core innovation in Grow VC’s arsenal of unique funding models and the reason behind Grow VC’s inception. In 2009 the company was also the first to announce a global service-investment model, whereby service providers in the industry can invest in companies using work resources as “sweat equity,” in addition to money.

Joining Grow VC, and the basic features such as building a person profile, are free. Premium features including the services above come with subscriptions ranging from $20 to $140 per month, depending on how much money the startup company is seeking or how much the investor is looking to invest. For unlimited service investments, the monthly subscription fee is $90 per month.

Following its first five months in public beta, Grow VC’s community just reached 700 registered users from within the startup and investment communities.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

iPad and Apps Economy

Thursday, January 28th, 2010
Google Buzz

We all now know officially that Apple launched iPad. It is an interesting new concept between mobile phones and laptops. And definitely it will have and need a lot of applications to be successful. We saw already some games, books, and newspapers that are available.

iPadThe next step is to get developers to make much more apps. Paul Grim, a General Partner at venture capital firm SunBridge Partners, commented the apps business from the traditional VC point of view in Venturebeat’s article, An investor’s take on the iPad — how to parse the hype. In this article Paul Grim says:

Although I do believe there will be many successful apps on the iPad, I don’t believe they are generally venture-backed material. As with most of the iPhone apps, this will be a hits-driven business with little capital intensity; most of the successes will likely be angel or self-funded.”

This is the same point Grow VC has emphasized many times (like yesterday). We have actually divided the mobile startups now into two main categories (there are of course much more segments inside these categories):

  1. Hardware and more demanding technical platform startups
  2. Application startups

The first category includes companies that have been funded by traditional VC’s. But many of those firms also need seed funding before a VC round. The second category is not really for the traditional VC’s. But it doesn’t mean that they are not good business opportunities. But the capital structure and risk profile is different from VC’s targets. They can start with small money, and it is not technology risk, but much more market risk, i.e. can they really get loyal users.

This is one reason, why new models for seed and startup funding are needed. And we believe Grow VC’s concepts, which we have now in beta and especially new ones we launch in this year, will offer a new way to fund these companies.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Future of Venture Capital

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010
Google Buzz
Silhouettes representing healthy, overweight, ...

Image via Wikipedia

Today I was reading one of my favorite VC blogs AVC by Fred Wilson about “The Venture Diet is Working“, where he says:

2010 will be an interesting year. If VC investments go back up to $25bn to $30bn per year, then the diet didn’t stick and we are back to an overfunded industry that will produce subpar returns on average.

If, on the other hand, the new normal is $15bn to $20bn per year, then the diet worked and we’ve scaled back the business to healthy levels.

This comment relates to he’s earlier post about the “Venture Capital Math Problem“, where he explains about the problem that – too much money will make the whole VC industry to under perform.

As this is one of the reasons we have started Grow VC, I wanted to point out that things are not the same everywhere. So here’s my take on the topic:

I think this is similar problem than it is with food. In some western countries there is too much food and problems that are associated with that, like obesity. Yet in many parts of the world, people are starving.

So if some markets in the world have too much money in VC, it does not mean there is too much money overall, it’s just wrongly distributed. I do understand that, there are also problems with having too much money per sector, so that nobody is getting good results, but that too is wrong distribution.

Early VC money should always be going towards new innovation and not to be “me too in the popular segment” – there are plenty of problems in the world for entrepreneurs to solve & VC’s to be successful.

If we think that “Four Years After Founding, Kiva Hits $100 Million In Microloans“, I feel that it’s a strong indication that entrepreneurship in all shape and sizes can be instrumental on reshaping our world for the better.

There is a big gap between what Kiva.org is doing and with these problems of having too much money in venture capital in some regions. For us this shows that there needs to be much better distribution, more transparency and more activity in this segment overall – and this is exactly where we are focusing our efforts.

Here’s my dialog with Fred, on the “Venture Capital Math problem” 8 months ago:

Me:

I think this just shows that money does not solve problems. The problem here is not too much money, but how it’s now distributed.

VC industry is starting to look like the newspaper industry ;) – better to wake up, the blogs are coming…

Fred:

What are the blogs of the VC business?Things like Y Combinator are great but they are feeding us even more opportunities so I see them as additive, Although I also see blogs as additive for the newspaper business if they’d just see themselves as curators and aggregators instead of content creators

Me:

I guess the closest thing to “blogs of VC industry” today are angel investors. But that’s for today. Also Y-combinator and the likes are great too and could be considered as “blogs of VC industry”. However their “next step” need to change away from just VC’s.

The fundamental change will become, when there are “platforms” for anyone to start a “blog for VC industry” and that’s what we are doing in www.growvc.com.

Overall, we feel that in long term the money will be spread to more potential start-ups and more of them will not go via IPO but just buy back of shares, mergers etc. with lower ROI. But that’s OK if the time for ROI is shorter and cost of management is lower.

So – be more direct, spread wider, lower the management cost, speed up the ROI cycle and you can accept lower ROI.

If you think about the structure of today, from where the VC money really comes from, you start to see the “big picture”. – basically it means that individuals like you and me pay for pensions funds etc. and these funds then invest to VC funds. VC’s then make investment decisions and “manage” the investments, all the way to take it public (hopefully). Basically just to sell it back to us…

When more people will start to understand this cycle because of more info and transparency online (if they are interested), people will not accept this structure. Because in the long run what matter is, if the companies in question sell what matters. And that is not a question of size.

Fred:

Got it
I hope this works
It would scale much better

Related to this topic, below is a very interesting speech given by Fred Wilson at talks@google. You need to spare an hour to look the whole video, but I feel it’s well worth it. Just have some popcorn & coke and relax.

What makes it interesting to me, is that those industries that are going to be disrupted by internet in the future, currently have same issues what Venture Capital does, yet for some reason those would not apply to VC industry.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

How to approach “protecting the idea” -problem?

Monday, January 4th, 2010
Google Buzz

Image by stevendepoloDuring the past 18 moths or so, while developing Grow VC team, company, service and pitching with various people about our service and business model, there have been a certain feedback given about the obstacles that we can expect to face for our service.

One of them that we have gotten more than few times is the issues of “How to protect the idea?” in a very transparent service like Grow VC. Mainly we have got this feedback from those people that have not build their own startup before and/or have not done any investing. Few days back there was a related question about this topic in linkedin that I tweeted about.

Also few days back there was a feedback in our service, asking:

Could you please advise who would evaluate my startup idea? And how my idea is protected? Normally, if I go to a VC, do they sign an NDA or something? I think entrepreneurs are reluctant to release info to the public without protection (in this case, a closed group of people… but still public). Thanks again for your advices. Happy New Year!

and my answer to this was:

In first place it’s evaluated by us (grow VC) and if it’s approved then people with active funder, expert or entrepreneur (that have active/approved startup) will see the information you choose to provide.

In today’s world, VC and more professional Angel Investors don’t sign NDA’s and the reason is simple, they see same ideas many times over and don’t really want to be in trouble by some NDA – much easier just not to sign NDA.

I also pointed to that LinkedIn question for more reading about the subject, where some of the answers point out the following things to think about:

  • If the idea is truly disruptive, you can be pretty sure that large companies would not come anywhere near it
  • Fear is a great motivator to perform. Use this fear to your advantage in design, strategy and execution.
  • Market forces even destroy patentable ideas , their is least you can do if somebody copies your idea and starts producing it
  • Get out of this is to reach to market faster and tie up with VC’s/big organisations who can support you with some stake in your profits
  • If you are in the process of raising funds and presenting business plans for the same here is what I suggest take all that is propriety out of the biz plan and replace it with a teaser instead, when talks have moved to the nest level and trust is built in represent the biz plan with its key elements
  • Ensure you have a great team and that the goals, vision and responsibility of all is clear.

Bottom line is that usually “the idea alone” is not that interesting for anyone seriously thinking of acting on it. Some of the other things to consider is that there are plenty of proven and successful business models to copy. So if someone is into copying, they can just opt to copy these business models and take those to new markets. Those can have much less risk and can actually even be acquired by the company that came up with the original idea. Few links: Facebook copies, Graics list (video), and there is plenty more if you want to google them.

Also being first to market is not always the best position to be in. Google is probably one of the most know example of the company that was not first to market (not even close), yet managed to become the most dominant player in Internet, while starting as a new startup, going against the big companies.

If in deed your startup is all alone first in market, that can also be a bad thing, either there is NO market, or it can be way too costly to educate everyone to create and/or wait for the market. IE. wrong market timing.

So how to approach the “idea protecting”- problem?

When you come up wit the idea that you are seriously thinking of acting on, you should:

  1. make a simple plan and move forward with it
  2. note that most ideas evolve to something else as the plan is moved forward

If you are not going after the idea, you shouldn’t worry, someone will most likely come up with the same/similar idea. Best option may just be to blog about it and have some credit for it later on to build your profile, like many people that do this all the time.

Usually those people that come up with one good idea, come to have more good ideas in the future. So in fact you may hold yourself back from even bigger idea, if you cant act or give up on the previous one.

If in deed you choose to make a GO for the idea, you should first check the patent option.

Is the idea patentable (this is not a legal advise)?

In some countries you can find free or cheap government or city organizations that can help evaluate if the idea could be patentable. If it would, there can also be some grants or similar to cover some of the patenting costs. – Even if there’s not, it can be pretty affordable to apply for national patent.

In any case you should talk to patent attorney/expert to get their feedback (that is typically free). If they think it’s patentable, you can always try to negotiate for revenue share or some other deal. There is also a tool for this in our service.

If the idea included enough innovation to be patented, then you may choose to do so to patent the core parts of the idea (the secret sauce).

Note. There can be BIG difference on innovations that get patent in different countries and by who does the application and who makes decision.

If you have chosen to apply for patent even in only one country, typically you will get 12 months worldwide priority to continue applying in other countries. As long as you do your new/other markets applications on time you will be able to keep your priority and protect the possible patent you may be granted.

If or not the actual patent is granted you don’t need to wit for that, since you do have the priority protection time you can use, if you choose to continue the patent process. So after the first application is in, you are pretty safe from this priority point of view for several months.

If the patent would be granted then eventually you will end with the cost problem of applying to different country and protecting your patent. So after the initial priority time, it starts to become much more costly, unless the patent is denied.

Speed is your protection

When you choose to act on the idea, regardless if you choose to apply for the patent or not, speed is your best protection and asset as a startup. Before you start to talk about your idea to new contacts, you should focus on optimizing your actions on how you will move forward to build your team, momentum and user base.

Few thing are clear, you simply can not move forward or raise capital without sharing the idea, so you need to make sure you are moving as fast as possible with right steps and using right metrics. Even if you have priority to the idea with patent pending, you still need to keep your speed, before the cost of applying and protecting it will start to add up.

And to do this, as one of the answers in that linkedin question pointed out you should build the other material about the plan so that you explain enough about the overall business model and then put teaser information to any public or general information / presentation, that will still build a “good enough, but interesting” overall picture of the solution/business model, while leaving the “secret sauce” part to be shared selectively or by request only.

Other things to think about

You should consider that most likely there is someone already working with the same idea. The earlier you can find out who they are, in what stage they are and with what resources they are working with – the earlier you can choose to either compete or choose a another idea to work on – before you have spent money, time and resources of your own and others, just to learn later that you are already way behind with much less resources. Or both of you could actually see that it may be more beneficial to join forces and make joint and more stronger venture in the very early stage.

Current visibility settings in our service

In Grow VC service at the moment, we have one level of visibility for the information shared in startup, so all information in startup profile is visible to all people that have active funder or expert role and to entrepreneurs that have active startup profile in the service.

So, if there is any core “secret sauce” part to your startup, you can keep that core information to yourself and share it by request. But you still need to make the other part interesting enough or there will be nobody asking for more information and therefore you speed slows down.

In later updates we will add additional level for those “secret sauce parts”, that you can choose to open access to by request.

As for Grow VC – our service is not the first to market, so we are betting on the market timing and better service with some core innovation, where some are out, some will be launched by the end of this month and some later on. – Yet, we also already have some copy cats of our own already and this we consider to be a good sign :)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Why investment agreements are secrets?

Sunday, November 29th, 2009
Google Buzz

Do you know a VC that is ready to publish their investment agreements? I haven’t seen too many. And if you ask about this, some venture capitalists don’t like the question. They start to explain, how it is a benefit of both parties to have confidential agreements. I agree there are

Investment Agreement

details that can be confidential, for example valuation, but is it really necessary to hide all terms and conditions. Would it be good for entrepreneurs and for the whole startup business to know openly terms and conditions from different companies before any decisions?

Why I raise this questions. Because many entrepreneurs feel they have been cheated when they finally understand all details, e.g. liquidation preferences, anti-dilution, and decision veto terms. I think it is not so much a problem with top tier VC’s that really make success stories. But there are so many tier 2 or lower VC’s (e.g. local ones in Europe and elsewhere) that don’t make too many success stories and they play with terms and conditions to get ROI for themselves but nothing for founders or business angels that have invested before VC’s. I know many entrepreneurs or business angels who have done big mistakes with their first company. Often people are not willing to talk about these experiences.

Grow VC is going to use public investment terms and conditions for its investment concepts (e.g. the new model we launch in January) and we also publish guidelines for angel investments. We also try to develop concepts that put all parties to more equal position. We believe it is also the best for businesses. It must the common interest of all parties to get benefits from the success of a company. And we want that all parties can comment and develop these concepts.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Update – Grow VC private Beta

Friday, July 17th, 2009
Google Buzz
Tip of The Iceberg

By stargazr441

A warm welcome to all new readers and members in Grow VC. It’s now been a bit over two weeks from our first beta launch, that we had scheduled for the 2nd Q of 2009. So it’s a good time to share some of the things we have experienced.

During our developments, it’s always been very important for us to be able to keep our planned dates and milestones. So as we were approaching the end of June, we started to finalize the material and features we had ready so far and put up the initial private beta service and our main site.

In typical startup manner we were pulling long hours to get everything to the point needed for us to pull this off. When it came to the day of launch we still had some minor hiccups, and missed our target launch time by a few minutes.

Other than that small delay, we could have not asked for more than what we got for our initial launch response -  we were all extremely exited to see the first posts written about our service and see people lined up in our server hitting “reload” in their browser to see when it went live (my apologies for those who had to wait a few extra minutes).

Here’s some of the posts written about Grow VC so far:

ReadWriteWeb
ArcticStartup
Museum of Modern Betas
The Startup
London Calling
The Next Women
Open Gardens

After the big push on working towards the launch, going through this first beta launch, seeing the great initial response from the markets, seeing people registering to our service and immediately starting to give us feedback, I feel personally very humble to be able to continue our journey with you, so a BIG thanks for those that have helped us so far and those registering to our service and wanting to be part of our venture to “forever change the early stage funding model.” After all this is just the beginning! And we are here for the long haul!

Now – after the launch, first being just exhausted after all of the work and hoopla, then enjoying the launch, registrations and feedback we are receiving – to pulling all of this initial feedback and thoughts back together, we have been fixing bugs and adding new features as fast as possible. Also we have had to do some new features we had not planned and restructure some of our existing features. We are very exited to continue our work towards the next milestones in our road map.

As we are running our private beta, we are taking new registrations in limited numbers by invitation only and we have released some invitation codes via above sites.  We have also invitations available via different Grow VC LinkedIn groups.

We are doing this invitation model during private beta, to be able to make sure we can continue to develop our service in an organized manner and communicate with users to help make our service better for everyone.

The road ahead

As we have launched our private beta and there is something to put your head around, there is so much more that we can and want to communicate about our ideas and thinking about what Venture Capital 2.0 means to us. In coming posts we will start explaining more of our thinking and sharing our ideas. We’d also love to get your feedback comments and ideas, on how can we do better.

At the moment, there are a few of the original core ideas with matching feature updates to our service from the early days, that we are still holding onto, so we can release those later in a more official manner. You can expect these bigger releases, first this fall, and the next one by the start of 2010. The reason we are holding back on revealing these, is that there are important open negotiations going on with several parties around the world related to these announcements.

Other than those few bigger ideas, we want to openly share as much as we can about what we are doing and thinking, so those that want can participate and be part of the change we are doing.

We want you!

What comes to you, as a reader, user in our service, being an entrepreneur, expert or a funder, we could not think of a better and more valuable audience, that we would like to be able to serve with our solution.

  • as an entrepreneur in general and particularly in web and mobile space, I could not imagine better people that can really challenge us to do our best and give us the type of feedback that matters
  • as a funder, selecting start-ups that you feel have earned the extra resources, speed and/or visibility that you can help them to achieve by participate on funding and sharing your knowledge, contacts and expertise to benefit your joint venture
  • as an expert, putting all of your knowledge and skills to play an meaningful role, on making not only our service better, but also helping to build some extraordinary companies of the future

In our world that feels more unified by the day (at least in the online world anyway), there is no question that big changes continue to happen on so many fronts and that there will continue to be from small to extreme global problems that need to be solved. This is the exact reason why entrepreneurs are called to action by so many. Problems of all sizes need solving and industries of many types need serious restructuring.

We want to do our part by building a platform where new start-ups can have a seriously new launch-pad, that they can recognize as their own and you can help us develop it even better.

If you feel that what we are doing is important to you – we invite you to join us, via our service, LinkedIn Groups, FriendFeed and/or Facebook. To follow our progress, be sure to subscribe to our RSS feed and/or follow our Twitter feed.

There is so much that need to be done and so much you can do to help us – to help start-ups, starting right now by sharing your opinions and feedback below :)

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Regulation vs. transparency

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009
Google Buzz

regulatorPeople and media want to get more regulation to the finance sector. And politicians, of course, promise to do it. And many cases demonstrate that the existing regulation hasn’t work properly and many innocent people have lost their money. But I think the question is, whether we need more regulation, or better regulation, or more transparency. Often more regulation also means more complex structures that are more difficult to control and understand.

Hedge funds, different kind of derivatives, and several other new instruments are complex to understand, measure, and manage. And especially for investors they are like black boxes. One day they bring a lot of money, and another they take all your money. I believe there will be always new instruments in finance, we cannot stop it. But should regulators actually focus to support more transparent and open ways to make investments.

Peer-to-peer finance is a good example of openness. It can mean micro-loans, peer-to-peer lending, and open platforms to finance companies. It is not risk free. But it has much less complexity to understand and manage. People can also see, where is their money, and also understand their personal risk better. And if one company fails, it doesn’t cause a huge chain effect. Of course, all people are not willing or able to manage their own investments, but more and more people are able to do it, and willing to do it.

An issue is that more regulation can actually make this kind of transparent model more difficult to implement, because more regulation can mean more complex structure requirements, more control structures, and much higher costs. I really hope that politicians and regulators around the world understand this issue. The internet, more educated people, and general requirement for openness (2.0 world) should also mean more transparency in the finance sector. And the regulation should actually support to create more open and simpler finance instruments and models.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

2.0 Business – how to get money

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009
Google Buzz

I was speaking in Mobile World Congress in Barcelona yesterday. It was a session about Mobile 2.0 Business including many interesting start-up firms and big names like Google. It was the most popular session in MWC so far in this year. People really start to understand the meaning of 2.0. One topic I covered was a need for new funding models that are also linked to new models to monetize 2.0 and especially social media. I share here some main points:

2.0 is doing together and sharing

  • Co-create, co-develop, co-funding, and co-succeed
  • It’s about individuals, conversations, and communities
  • High transparency

2.0 enterprises ARE NOT new technology enterprises

  • New business models
  • Help people to do things together
  • Funding and earning models Challenges

Don’t under-estimate the importance of funding and revenue!

  • Social media has good opportunities to monetize services, but it cannot use old models to do it
  • Same with funding
  • New models are needed

New funding models like Grow VC

Investors from around the world

Direct or Community investments

Long tail of investors

  • Can also bring old models, like co-operatives, back
  • Co-op communities can mix sales and funding: owners get benefits

Total transparency

  • Not only to evaluate companies, but investors too
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Social lending – new finance models are doing well

Wednesday, January 28th, 2009
Google Buzz

Zopa.com is a social lending service and kiva.org is a micro-loan service. At last weekend many British newspapers wrote about Zopa. Now when all banks have a lot of bad loans, Zopa has done very well. And it seems to be a surprise for many traditional finance sector people that Zopa has very few bad loans. Independent writes “Andrew Hagger, from the financial advice website Moneynet.co.uk, admits that when Zopa was launched, he had misgivings. These, he says, have eased over time. ‘I was worried about the possibility of savers losing out due to borrowers defaulting, but after three years there is no sign of this. The key is that, through precise credit scoring, Zopa does tend to be careful over who gets the loans.’”

Independent summarizes “On the other side of the coin, borrowers have seen credit-card, loan and overdraft rates rise as banks grow ever more reluctant to lend. Even people with a good credit history are being charged more or refused a loan altogether. Against this backdrop, any initiative that offers to cut out the banks is bound to appeal. This is where Zopa.com, the money-exchange website, fits in. It styles itself as a market offering ‘loans from people, not banks’. Basically, it matches individuals with cash to lend to individuals looking to borrow.”

Zopa.com and kiva.org are good examples, how new kind of finance and funding concepts can work in the Internet. They are social, they are open and transparent, and they are for longtail. There are still a lot of people who are skeptical, whether this kind of models can really change finance models and business. But we start to have enough evidences that at least these new models have demand and space to grow. And the current crisis of financial institutions will accelerate the growth of new models.


  • Share/Save/Bookmark