Archive for the ‘learning’ Category

Podcast: Grow VC presentation at Sun, Sand and Startups event

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010
Google Buzz

On Thursday the 18th of Feb just few days after our launch, the second triple-s/Founders Lounge co-production by Sun, Sand and Startups group took place at the Gran Foc, featuring a talk by Jouko, titled “New funding opportunities for web and mobile startups around the world”.

Thanks to Kristian and his team here is the recorded podcast from the event. Below is some of the topics from Jouko’s presentation:

You can listen for the podcast below and you can also subscribe to Grow VC podcast via iTunes. Sorry for the occasional background noise and that it was cut short at the end. Again big thanks to Kristian and his team.

 
icon for podpress  Grow VC at Sun, Sand and Startups event: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

If anyone still has any doubt that new models are needed…

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010
Google Buzz

Please take a look at this video.

To me, future looks perfect for entrepreneurs. What do you think?

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Future of Angel Investing?

Saturday, February 27th, 2010
Google Buzz

Today I got a question about “International angel investing. Can it work?” – from Giandomenico that posted it in LinkedIn.

In his question he’s pondering about the angel investing in international level. The main point in the question is to compare it to more local investing and in what situations would international angel investing work.

My idea is that an international angel investment is frequently a co-investment with a local (and trusted) angel investor. Otherwise, international angel investment can happen if the amount of invested money is very small and limited for the investor and if both the investor and the entrepreneur are good at communicating through email and throughsoftwares like Skype, webex etc. But these are particular cases.

I think this is a very good question so I wanted to spend some time thinking about it, to answer properly. Here’s my answer to he’s question:

I think you pretty much got this right.

I also think it’s not so much of local or international than it is who knows who. Typically angel investments are referrals within a network. That network can be friends, friends of friends or some professional network and ultimately a professional angel investing network.

It just happens to be that there are more locally focused networks, since building any kind of international network in past have been much more difficult and costly.

So my answer for situation today, is that international angel investing happens where there are angels that have personal networks of friends that are internationally spread out.

How do I think this will change in the future?

1. Now that there are so much more effective tools that enable people to join networks that are international and find new friends online, this will start to increase.

2. When the next generation of angel investors grow from people commonly using facebook in their daily activities today, it’s very simple for them to also feel comfortable making investment decisions with their online (angel investing) friends, if they trust their opinions in other matters in their life as well.

3. When the costs related per investment comes down with more effective tools online and at the same time there is bigger pool of deal flow, that will enable new options.

Crowdfunding can also be fundingcrowd

If the concept for crowdfunding in fund raising side means;

- instead of looking for few people with plenty of money, choosing to find plenty of people with small money

Then for investing that can be translated to;

- instead of putting plenty of money to few startups, choosing to put little money to many startups.

From investors point of view this is a balance between how much they want to distribute their risk.

These are the reasons we are building Grow VC, to help enable this development for international angel investing. More deal flow to choose from, social network of like minded people to make new international friends, bring down the cost per deal and smaller investment to more startups.

We also believe, that in future by enabling more efficient tools it also makes sense to do smaller rounds more often to make it easier for startup to be agile and also limit the risk by investing into “momentum” and milestones based funding – milestone by milestone.

This all have possibility to make stuff more “real”, when the focus is more in the near future, rather than 3 years with hockey stick plan.

Last July my co-founder Jouko also wrote about this topic with the topic “invest globally or locally“. What’s your thoughts on this topic and how do you see this developing in the future?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Grow VC model in full detail

Friday, February 26th, 2010
Google Buzz

It’s now been 10 days since the launch of our community fund model and we have been following the market response very closely. Overall the feedback have been positive and supportive to what we are doing. So let me take this opportunity to personally thank all of you for your feedback and support.

The past 20 months or so, since coming up with the core idea for Grow VC crowdfunding model, it’s been quite a big push to get to this point. First, building up our great team and then starting to execute on the Grow VC strategy, by designing the service with all of it’s details and then actually build it – while at the same time working through all legal matters and building our overall company structures internationally. – I’m very proud of our team!

But whats really fun, is the fact that we are only getting started. – To us, we are now in the “Minimum Viable Product” stage and are looking forward to innovating and building our service even further with all of you.

In the past year or so, when we have talked about or core model with different people around the world – in person, we have learned that it takes some time to get the mind around all the details of our service. So I think now – 10 days after our community fund launch, is a good time to share more details about our service overall.

Outline of business model

Grow VC ServiceGrow VC offers a platform for investors and entrepreneurs to find one another, by registering to the Grow VC community online. One can assume one or several of four roles in the community, the roles of an individual, a funder, an entrepreneur or an expert. Each role come with related features available inside the service, to manage start-up fund raising process, related activities, communications and/or portfolio of start-ups. The subscription based membership fee is based on the profile or role of your choice and additional parameters (how much capital you want to raise for your start-up or what your investing budget is). The community then facilitates the matching process.

Members who pay subscription fee can assess, evaluate and comment start-ups and related details through transparent information in the community. Direct investments (angel investments) can also be made to start-ups with funder role. There is no fees in direct investments, since fees are only in subscriptions. Subscribed members are asked to suggest investment targets for the community fund out of the available start-ups in the community, for the value of 75 % of paid membership fee, e.g. 15 dollars if the membership fee is 20 dollars. This will serve as a viable peer-rating system, in order to ensure that everyone in the community has to evaluate start-ups also as any investor would. According to the start-ups success, the members will be rewarded based on the Grow VC rating system.

This unique model of Grow VC, helps entrepreneurs to start looking at other start-ups like investor and therefore make it easier to understand what type of information funders are looking for and what it takes to find interesting start-ups. In return this will help entrepreneurs to improve their own start-ups profile to make it more complete, understandable and interesting for other funding members.

At the same time this will in addition to paying for the full-features, each member also have an opportunity earn financial rewards for finding good investments for the community fund, regardless what happens with their other activities.

Different roles in the community

The person (free)
The most basic form of registration, currently free of charge, will allow you to access the community, participate on discussions inside the service and see information on a general level. For those looking to publish their start-up the free profile also allows to start building the start-up profile. The person profile is restricted from viewing in-depth person profiles and start-ups, and cannot participate in the actual entrepreneur – investor matching. Also, the person profile will not participate in the community fund functions. This profile is mainly intended for getting acquainted with the service and choosing a role in the Grow VC community.

The entrepreneur and the start-up
The entrepreneur profile is meant for those who register start-ups to the Grow VC community and start-ups are detailed profiles of these early ventures, containing relevant, accurate and detailed information about the start-up, e.g. business plans, growth projections, sensitivity analysis and so on.

There can be one or more entrepreneurs involved in one registered start-up. The entrepreneur profile is free of charge, but can only be created once you belong to a start-up profile. Entrepreneur profiles become active once the start-up profile is subscribed and published inside the service. Start-up profiles can include relevant information of the start-up, for investors and other experts to be able to review, evaluate and help improve the business operations. Entrepreneurs choose what information and in what detail they want to share with the community. Entrepreneurs can also invite other key people (like advisory board members) to be linked to their start-up profile for free.

There is always an ongoing dialog with the community, regarding development needs and things to consider in the start-up.
Start-ups are charged a membership rate according to the amount of capital they aim to raise out of Grow VC’s service.

The funder
Funders are private individuals, commonly called angel investors or partners of a venture capital firm. Funders seek out viable start-ups and make investment decisions based on their interest or expertise. The funder profiles are always represented by real people and in order to conduct direct investments, member that applies for funder role must confirm their legality and validity to become a funder, according to their corresponding legislation per Grow VC Terms Of Service.

Via Grow VC platform, funders can extend their deal flow beyond their own markets and enter more geographically syndicated investments. The membership charge of the funder profile is based on the investment budget of the funder.

The expert
The experts are professionals specializing in various activities within the Grow VC community, ensuring that the start-ups gain the support and guidance they may need to develop into successful new ventures. The experts provide professional services for start-up companies, such as legal counseling, incubation services, consultation etc.

The expert can be invited to join a start-up for free, in order to develop the start-up further and to bring credibility to the venture. If invited, they may participate and develop only the start-up that they were invited into, agreeing on terms with the start-up, granting some sort of return for the expert himself. The expert can also be utilized when managing investments, in strategic positions such as on the board of directors in start-ups, in order to ensure the supervision and support the start-up will need in order to maximize its potential of success.

With the paid expert profile, the expert may see all start-up profiles and participate in commenting and networking within the service, in order to promote the experts services and gain an extensive affiliation within the community. The paid expert profile grants a large role in the Grow VC community, developing the start-ups into profitable ventures.

Raising capital and funding start-ups

The peer-review system
As members pay the membership fee, 75 % of that fee is allocated for them as a budget from Grow VC community fund for fund to invest in any of the community’s start-ups. These micro investments are small by themselves, but as a whole they are of great importance and fuel the whole community. If, for any reason, that investment is not made, the capital will remain in the community fund for future investments.

These investment selections serve as a peer-review system for the community’s start-ups and since members are making these selection with Grow VC’s real money money with potential credit and rewards, they will pay attention to choosing the most promising start-up for community fund to invest in.

As the community proceeds with its selections, the most popular start-ups become of increasing importance and attention, even  for investors outside the community after they have undergone a process of scrutiny by the Grow VC community. This peer-review system of micro funding could result in a better success rate of start-ups and therefore a higher rate of return on investments, if the community is able to develop and pick out the most promising start-ups.

The three ways of investing in a start-up

Direct Investments
The Grow VC community allows those with membership profiles to view different start-ups, review and search out promising start-ups. Those with funder role may conduct a direct investment to the start-up. Actual deals are managed through one of the  the Grow VC certified partners.

If, for some reason at any time, the funder wants to cancel the investment, he or she may do so before the actual closing the deal is done via certified partner. All activity is show in the investment history of the users profile.

“Sweat Equity” investments
In addition to purely monetary investments, users with Expert role who possess expertise in some area of interest for the start-up, can invest their time, or sweat equity into a start-up. This investment can improve the credibility and attention of the start-up, as well as increase the likelihood of success and the pace of development of the business model and logic.

Even as this sweat equity investment is not in monetary terms, it may benefit both parties involved, as well as all the start-ups stakeholders, as the venture develops through and with right balance of experts and professionals.

Community fund investments
Community fund (that is owned and managed by Grow VC), makes it’s investments based only by the selections made by all subscribed members. Subscribed members may access, evaluate and comment the start-ups and then with their own budget of the community fund (equal to 75% of their paid membership fee) decide for community fund to invest in the most interesting start-up company. Actual investment by community fund are made by Grow VC and managed by Grow VC or via agreed third party (like expert, lead funder or certified partner)

Grow VC Core Process

Raising capital

When a start-up is created the entrepreneurs assign a target amount of capital for that start-up to raise. The entrepreneurs may attract investments to the start-up by providing extensive information about the start-up, e.g. business plan, projections or cash-flow analysis, by boosting credibility by involving professionals, e.g. consultants, lawyers or entrepreneurs with good track records and so on. The start-up may attract community members, who may choose to make direct investments, use their budget of the community fund or their own time and expertise depending on their role, or offer suggestions and comments in order to develop the venture further. There success of the start-up is up to the entrepreneurs.

Closing

When this target amount is reached, either through micro-investments by the community fund or through a combination of direct and micro-investments, the target start-up is then moved into closing proceeds to a third party where the actual deal is done and financial operations are conducted. Only then will the financial transactions take place. As the community fund investment is transferred to the start-up, Grow VC acquires a set percentage of ownership in the start-up company and an professional agreed by involved parties may take a board seat in the start-up.

Grow VC Deal Closing ProcessIf, for some reason, users back out and cancel their investment during the closing process, then the target amount of capital is no longer accomplished and the target start-up becomes open for investments once again.

ROI, community rewards and rating system

Grow VC RewardsSome start-ups will fail, losing all the invested capital, while others will be successful, generating a return on investment for the investors. Funders that have made direct investments with their own capital will get their own ROI directly. Return on investment made by Grow VC community fund investments will be divided in accordance to the Grow VC rating system, between the members who made the original community fund selections. Grow VC rating system ranks the members with a certain set of parameters, including, but not limited to the timing of the investment (e.g. first, among the first, the last to invest) and the relative amount of capital invested from their available budget. The members, who gain the best rating in accordance to this system, have earned a larger portion of the return than those who are rated lower according to this system.

The timing of the selection is determined by a set of parameters, ranking the member on how early on he or she was able to identify the successful start-up. The score decreases as the investor follows other members, motivating the individual members to seek out the promising start-ups as soon as possible and as efficiently as possible.

The relative amount of their budged used will be determined by a set of parameters, judging the members on the “gutsiness” of his or her selection, i.e. how much of the members budget was targeted in the start-up. This will serve as a rank rating the amount of “quality certainty” in the investment decisions, encouraging the members to conduct an extensive review of the start-ups, comment and help them develop their ventures.

Combining this rating system with the community reward will encourage funders, as well as other members, to seek out start-ups early on and conduct a thorough screening of the business plans, concepts and ventures in general. In addition to the community reward being distributed according to the rating system, the system itself becomes a sort of merit for community members. Grow VC may even encourage this process by awarding the highest rated members in the community with additional acknowledgment or prize at a certain time.

Values

Grow VC model is complemented by some fundamental values that bring credibility and conviction to the concept and business model. The core fundamental value is transparency. Transparency in the community and all operations will provide the community with a sense of trust in the system and a conviction of how things are conducted. As financial platforms online, especially in the investment community, value honesty and transparency, it is of utmost importance to provide these to the community, with e.g. transparent term sheets and community investments. When dealing in such a professional niche, it is perceived as most important to make clear the operating systems and ground rules of the community, also to provide the community enough transparency to be able to enforce rules on its own.

So there you have it in full detail. Let us know what do you think?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

How to build a presentation like Steve Jobs

Friday, February 19th, 2010
Google Buzz
SAN FRANCISCO - JUNE 09:  (FILE PHOTO) Apple C...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

For any Start up, there is a need to build a great pitch and make it effective. Here are the most typical topics you should cover in your first short pitch, where the goal simply is to have a change in the next step.

  • The problem
  • The solution
  • The market
  • The plan to reach the market (inc. your team’s knowledge base)
  • Proposed Deal

If you think about this in “PowerPoint format”, in your elevator pitch (3-5 min), you should not have more than 5 points per slide with max 7 rows of text. The idea is that you only hit the highlights and make your audience “want to hear/read the details” = your goal.

Here’s few pointers by Carmine Gallo about the Presentation Secrets of Steve Jobs.

  1. first set the theme
  2. outline your presentation and make it clear when you have covered one thing before moving on to the next one
  3. BE excited. If you are not, why would the audience be?
  4. sell experiences or value, not the features
  5. make it visual, less text more images
  6. practise, practise and practise

More in the video below.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Welcome to The Year Of Tiger

Sunday, February 14th, 2010
Google Buzz
Chinese New Year Tiger
Image by Fuzzybunn via Flickr

Happy Chinese New Year!

The Year of the Tiger will bring far reaching changes for everyone. New inventions and incredible technological advances have a good chance of occurring. For all of the Chinese horoscope signs, this year is one to be active – seizing opportunities and making the most of our personal and very individual talents. Everything happens quickly and dramatically in a Tiger year – blink and you could miss an important chance of a lifetime!

This is the last day for claiming your free “premium account” for 2010 valued up to $1,200, that includes one or many of the following:

  • active startup profile (+ entrepreneur role)
  • expert role
  • funder role

Steps to claim your free “premium account” for 2010:

  1. Register
  2. After registration, complete your profile
  3. Go to the Subscription & Role page
  4. Select your subscription type
  5. Click “apply for subscription”


Tell a friend
Small things that you do can create great opportunities for you and people you care for. Let your friends know there’s only 1 day left to get their own free Grow VC premium subscription for 2010. You can even use your affiliate link if you like.
More details about the affiliate model

Good luck for the year of the Tiger!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Risk Assessment of Embedded Mobility Propositions

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010
Google Buzz

Today Jouko is giving a speach at the Informa Telecoms & Media’s Embedded  Connectivity conference in London. The conference is about bringing the entire ecosystem together to discuss the  prospects for incorporating connectivity into products and devices of the  future.

The conference will give operators and vendors  the chance to really understand how to deliver the benefits of connectivity to the wider technology industries as well as opening up limitless  possibilities for new consumer markets.

Below is Jouko’s presentation, where the topics include:

  • VC Market
  • Embedded connectivity solutions
  • HW and platform business
  • Web and mobile businesses
  • Go-to-market
  • Challenges of funding market
  • Mobile services funding
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Future of Venture Capital

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010
Google Buzz
Silhouettes representing healthy, overweight, ...

Image via Wikipedia

Today I was reading one of my favorite VC blogs AVC by Fred Wilson about “The Venture Diet is Working“, where he says:

2010 will be an interesting year. If VC investments go back up to $25bn to $30bn per year, then the diet didn’t stick and we are back to an overfunded industry that will produce subpar returns on average.

If, on the other hand, the new normal is $15bn to $20bn per year, then the diet worked and we’ve scaled back the business to healthy levels.

This comment relates to he’s earlier post about the “Venture Capital Math Problem“, where he explains about the problem that – too much money will make the whole VC industry to under perform.

As this is one of the reasons we have started Grow VC, I wanted to point out that things are not the same everywhere. So here’s my take on the topic:

I think this is similar problem than it is with food. In some western countries there is too much food and problems that are associated with that, like obesity. Yet in many parts of the world, people are starving.

So if some markets in the world have too much money in VC, it does not mean there is too much money overall, it’s just wrongly distributed. I do understand that, there are also problems with having too much money per sector, so that nobody is getting good results, but that too is wrong distribution.

Early VC money should always be going towards new innovation and not to be “me too in the popular segment” – there are plenty of problems in the world for entrepreneurs to solve & VC’s to be successful.

If we think that “Four Years After Founding, Kiva Hits $100 Million In Microloans“, I feel that it’s a strong indication that entrepreneurship in all shape and sizes can be instrumental on reshaping our world for the better.

There is a big gap between what Kiva.org is doing and with these problems of having too much money in venture capital in some regions. For us this shows that there needs to be much better distribution, more transparency and more activity in this segment overall – and this is exactly where we are focusing our efforts.

Here’s my dialog with Fred, on the “Venture Capital Math problem” 8 months ago:

Me:

I think this just shows that money does not solve problems. The problem here is not too much money, but how it’s now distributed.

VC industry is starting to look like the newspaper industry ;) – better to wake up, the blogs are coming…

Fred:

What are the blogs of the VC business?Things like Y Combinator are great but they are feeding us even more opportunities so I see them as additive, Although I also see blogs as additive for the newspaper business if they’d just see themselves as curators and aggregators instead of content creators

Me:

I guess the closest thing to “blogs of VC industry” today are angel investors. But that’s for today. Also Y-combinator and the likes are great too and could be considered as “blogs of VC industry”. However their “next step” need to change away from just VC’s.

The fundamental change will become, when there are “platforms” for anyone to start a “blog for VC industry” and that’s what we are doing in www.growvc.com.

Overall, we feel that in long term the money will be spread to more potential start-ups and more of them will not go via IPO but just buy back of shares, mergers etc. with lower ROI. But that’s OK if the time for ROI is shorter and cost of management is lower.

So – be more direct, spread wider, lower the management cost, speed up the ROI cycle and you can accept lower ROI.

If you think about the structure of today, from where the VC money really comes from, you start to see the “big picture”. – basically it means that individuals like you and me pay for pensions funds etc. and these funds then invest to VC funds. VC’s then make investment decisions and “manage” the investments, all the way to take it public (hopefully). Basically just to sell it back to us…

When more people will start to understand this cycle because of more info and transparency online (if they are interested), people will not accept this structure. Because in the long run what matter is, if the companies in question sell what matters. And that is not a question of size.

Fred:

Got it
I hope this works
It would scale much better

Related to this topic, below is a very interesting speech given by Fred Wilson at talks@google. You need to spare an hour to look the whole video, but I feel it’s well worth it. Just have some popcorn & coke and relax.

What makes it interesting to me, is that those industries that are going to be disrupted by internet in the future, currently have same issues what Venture Capital does, yet for some reason those would not apply to VC industry.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

How to approach “protecting the idea” -problem?

Monday, January 4th, 2010
Google Buzz

Image by stevendepoloDuring the past 18 moths or so, while developing Grow VC team, company, service and pitching with various people about our service and business model, there have been a certain feedback given about the obstacles that we can expect to face for our service.

One of them that we have gotten more than few times is the issues of “How to protect the idea?” in a very transparent service like Grow VC. Mainly we have got this feedback from those people that have not build their own startup before and/or have not done any investing. Few days back there was a related question about this topic in linkedin that I tweeted about.

Also few days back there was a feedback in our service, asking:

Could you please advise who would evaluate my startup idea? And how my idea is protected? Normally, if I go to a VC, do they sign an NDA or something? I think entrepreneurs are reluctant to release info to the public without protection (in this case, a closed group of people… but still public). Thanks again for your advices. Happy New Year!

and my answer to this was:

In first place it’s evaluated by us (grow VC) and if it’s approved then people with active funder, expert or entrepreneur (that have active/approved startup) will see the information you choose to provide.

In today’s world, VC and more professional Angel Investors don’t sign NDA’s and the reason is simple, they see same ideas many times over and don’t really want to be in trouble by some NDA – much easier just not to sign NDA.

I also pointed to that LinkedIn question for more reading about the subject, where some of the answers point out the following things to think about:

  • If the idea is truly disruptive, you can be pretty sure that large companies would not come anywhere near it
  • Fear is a great motivator to perform. Use this fear to your advantage in design, strategy and execution.
  • Market forces even destroy patentable ideas , their is least you can do if somebody copies your idea and starts producing it
  • Get out of this is to reach to market faster and tie up with VC’s/big organisations who can support you with some stake in your profits
  • If you are in the process of raising funds and presenting business plans for the same here is what I suggest take all that is propriety out of the biz plan and replace it with a teaser instead, when talks have moved to the nest level and trust is built in represent the biz plan with its key elements
  • Ensure you have a great team and that the goals, vision and responsibility of all is clear.

Bottom line is that usually “the idea alone” is not that interesting for anyone seriously thinking of acting on it. Some of the other things to consider is that there are plenty of proven and successful business models to copy. So if someone is into copying, they can just opt to copy these business models and take those to new markets. Those can have much less risk and can actually even be acquired by the company that came up with the original idea. Few links: Facebook copies, Graics list (video), and there is plenty more if you want to google them.

Also being first to market is not always the best position to be in. Google is probably one of the most know example of the company that was not first to market (not even close), yet managed to become the most dominant player in Internet, while starting as a new startup, going against the big companies.

If in deed your startup is all alone first in market, that can also be a bad thing, either there is NO market, or it can be way too costly to educate everyone to create and/or wait for the market. IE. wrong market timing.

So how to approach the “idea protecting”- problem?

When you come up wit the idea that you are seriously thinking of acting on, you should:

  1. make a simple plan and move forward with it
  2. note that most ideas evolve to something else as the plan is moved forward

If you are not going after the idea, you shouldn’t worry, someone will most likely come up with the same/similar idea. Best option may just be to blog about it and have some credit for it later on to build your profile, like many people that do this all the time.

Usually those people that come up with one good idea, come to have more good ideas in the future. So in fact you may hold yourself back from even bigger idea, if you cant act or give up on the previous one.

If in deed you choose to make a GO for the idea, you should first check the patent option.

Is the idea patentable (this is not a legal advise)?

In some countries you can find free or cheap government or city organizations that can help evaluate if the idea could be patentable. If it would, there can also be some grants or similar to cover some of the patenting costs. – Even if there’s not, it can be pretty affordable to apply for national patent.

In any case you should talk to patent attorney/expert to get their feedback (that is typically free). If they think it’s patentable, you can always try to negotiate for revenue share or some other deal. There is also a tool for this in our service.

If the idea included enough innovation to be patented, then you may choose to do so to patent the core parts of the idea (the secret sauce).

Note. There can be BIG difference on innovations that get patent in different countries and by who does the application and who makes decision.

If you have chosen to apply for patent even in only one country, typically you will get 12 months worldwide priority to continue applying in other countries. As long as you do your new/other markets applications on time you will be able to keep your priority and protect the possible patent you may be granted.

If or not the actual patent is granted you don’t need to wit for that, since you do have the priority protection time you can use, if you choose to continue the patent process. So after the first application is in, you are pretty safe from this priority point of view for several months.

If the patent would be granted then eventually you will end with the cost problem of applying to different country and protecting your patent. So after the initial priority time, it starts to become much more costly, unless the patent is denied.

Speed is your protection

When you choose to act on the idea, regardless if you choose to apply for the patent or not, speed is your best protection and asset as a startup. Before you start to talk about your idea to new contacts, you should focus on optimizing your actions on how you will move forward to build your team, momentum and user base.

Few thing are clear, you simply can not move forward or raise capital without sharing the idea, so you need to make sure you are moving as fast as possible with right steps and using right metrics. Even if you have priority to the idea with patent pending, you still need to keep your speed, before the cost of applying and protecting it will start to add up.

And to do this, as one of the answers in that linkedin question pointed out you should build the other material about the plan so that you explain enough about the overall business model and then put teaser information to any public or general information / presentation, that will still build a “good enough, but interesting” overall picture of the solution/business model, while leaving the “secret sauce” part to be shared selectively or by request only.

Other things to think about

You should consider that most likely there is someone already working with the same idea. The earlier you can find out who they are, in what stage they are and with what resources they are working with – the earlier you can choose to either compete or choose a another idea to work on – before you have spent money, time and resources of your own and others, just to learn later that you are already way behind with much less resources. Or both of you could actually see that it may be more beneficial to join forces and make joint and more stronger venture in the very early stage.

Current visibility settings in our service

In Grow VC service at the moment, we have one level of visibility for the information shared in startup, so all information in startup profile is visible to all people that have active funder or expert role and to entrepreneurs that have active startup profile in the service.

So, if there is any core “secret sauce” part to your startup, you can keep that core information to yourself and share it by request. But you still need to make the other part interesting enough or there will be nobody asking for more information and therefore you speed slows down.

In later updates we will add additional level for those “secret sauce parts”, that you can choose to open access to by request.

As for Grow VC – our service is not the first to market, so we are betting on the market timing and better service with some core innovation, where some are out, some will be launched by the end of this month and some later on. – Yet, we also already have some copy cats of our own already and this we consider to be a good sign :)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

How to build your core team for early-stage startup?

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010
Google Buzz

Few days back there was this good question in linkedin Q&A’s:

How to recruit top talents to build a startup with you? How many people will you recruit when you are just starting up?

Below is the reply I posted (with few additional edits). This also cover parts one and two in “The process from idea to competitive startup” -post, I have written earlier. Please note, this process is most relevant for startups with aim and potential for high growth.

Building the succesful startup

How to build your core team

Depending on the type of startup you are building, will lead to questions like; how many people and what skills are needed?, what milestones are you looking to hit, when and how fast?

Those will determine how you should look about building the startup. If you are aiming big, you will need to first look for co-founder or co-founders. There is a great post and podcast about this subject “How to pick a co-founder” at venturehacks. You may also want to see this post “Unlock Your Team’s Potential to Create Evangelists” by The FundingGuru.

After you have your co-founder and your product/service is in right stage, you can opt for what Wallace was suggesting “Get a nice chunk of VC and simply hire them and pay them what they are worth.” (if that is realistic option), or you can continue building the startup with your equity (shares).

So after co-founder(s), you can start to look for outside experts / service providers, that can join your startup with “sweat equity” type of deal and/or for core team employees, where you can opt to give shares + minimum salary even for top talents. More about this subject, see this video by my co-founder Jouko, about “Startups and Advisers“.

When you have these two routes (VC + hired employees or sweat equity + minimum pay), you need to choose the route that is achievable and makes the most sense for what you are doing. You should be calculating what will give you most value in the long run, IE. shares that you end up having & their value and the value of your team (resources, skills, commitment).

No VC (at least not a good one) will invest unless you can prove enough traction for the idea and product/service. And not unless you have at least one committed co-founder.

Being able to attract a good co-founder to join, + other core people on shares (+ optional minimum pay), is one very strong signal of traction on the idea and you also get committed resources.

If you are unable to attract top talent people with your shares, don’t expect VC’s to pay for those shares either, it’s a much harder sell.

In the very early stages, you will want to have very entrepreneurial and passionate people to join your startup (regardless of the position), those that agree and can absorb some limited financial risk (uncertain or very limited pay), without abandoning the startup before the agreed time/milestone is reached.

When you opt for “normal employee” type of deal, you better have enough money to pay them for the duration agreed. Because those type of top talent, will have plenty of options to choose from. And typically their personal life can not or they don’t want to be flexible on the compensation (no flexibility on personal finance, big spenders, spouse don’t agree etc.) – therefore, this option really is available only after you have raised enough cash or your are generating enough cash-flow.

In the answers there was also another good and thoughtful one given by Joe Abraham, where he starts with this advise:

Figure out what it is going to take to get your venture to a point where you have proof of concept and market traction. That is truly the only point when your business is considered “viable” and “investable”.

and then continues

Based on this established point (call it milestone #1), figure out WHO needs to be on the team to get you to milestone 1. Don’t try to recruit “top talent” at the management level yet. Focus your energy on the people who will actually build/sell your product.

Jump to original question to read his full answer.

Now that you are ready to start taking your idea or startup forward and build your core team, you may want to take advantage of our platform, where we provide you with the right tools to build your startup from idea to VC funding level. Including “service investment” -tool, to create, promote and negotiate your core team & advisor deals.

Note, all accounts and roles for 2010 are FREE for registrations done before 31st of January.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark