Archive for the ‘development’ Category

Announcing local platforms

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010
Google Buzz

From day one when we started building our platform over a year ago, it’s been in our strategy to offer our platform to other organizations that are actively developing their local startup ecosystems around the world.

For us to be able to enable the community funding model, we have had to build a lot of additional functionality around it so it can cater to related functions as well, like the different roles, basic social networking, service investments etc. As such the platform itself is very capable to cater as a basic platform to startup funding activities and we are actively developing it forward.

After having received an increasing amount of feedback and confirmation that there is a need for our type of platform in many parts of the world, we are now officially announcing local platforms concept.local

In this concept, each platform can be run independently by the local partner and are offered as a software as a service. Loacl platforms can be directly connected to our global platform or run as isolated networks with their own rules. In these isolated platforms, the members can independently choose to join the global platform and activate their profile there if they like.

This way local platforms can also be more customized to cater for the local needs and those can also cater to wider spectrum of business segments (in addition to just web & mobile).

startup

There is two main models for local platforms.

  1. If a local partner has its own funding model: revenue share -the local partner pays revenue share to Grow VC for the rights to use the platform and services. Part of this revenue will also go to global community fund. Grow VC’s services are not directly available for the local partners members, but members can independently choose to join Grow VC’s
  2. If the local partner wants to use Grow VC’s model as is: to use of the platform is free for the local partner and all its members have access to Grow VC’s global services, the members pay Grow VC’s membership fee normally. The local partner can get additional revenue from its own services for the members and from its own partners.

Since the local platforms are offered as software as a service, local platforms will enjoy all the benefits of the global platform developments (including the pat. pending community-fund crowdfunding model) and the best practises of other local networks.

With this model, we want to help local ecosystems in different cities and countries around the world and also have a connection to global markets & contacts for everyone to benefit from these connections.  Ultimately being able help entrepreneurs and startups also in other industries to grow from their local markets to global markets within the familiar network.

The kind of partners we are looking for are the types that this kinda role feels natural, those that are active in their own startup ecosystem, currently organizing startup events, running local angel network or offering similar tools for the local ecosystem at he moment.

Since we are just announcing this, we are looking to start this with few selected partners, so that we can also manage all of the details efficiently with each partner.

If you are interested to run your local network in our platform, contact us via partner@growvc.com

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Singapore sees the value of entrepreneurship

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010
Google Buzz

I have spent the last three days in Singapore. They have really hot season at the moment, almost 100 Fahrenheit every day. Someone said that it is hotter than for 100 years. And in Singapore it means hot! But I always like to be in this country; nice people and everything works.

Singapore

Singapore is one focus location for Grow VC, among maybe 6 other places in the world. The reason is that Singapore is an important hub in South East Asia, its government is very pro-business, it is one of the leading finance centers in the world, and it has also a lot of great young entrepreneurs. We, at Grow VC, are very much a global service, but for some practical reasons, it is important to have some hubs.

I met a lot of entrepreneurs, investors, governmental agencies, and other relevant people for startup funding. Governmental organizations, like iDA and Spring, are doing a lot of work to make Singapore attractive to entrepreneurs. They also have connections to other entrepreneurial center (that are also Grow VC focus places) like Silicon Valley and Israel.

I met the Singapore Venture Capital Association (Hwee Bin) that is doing important work to develop startup investments in Singapore, but also in the whole SEA region.  I also spent time with startup communities like e27 that is doing really important work to get startups to work better (Mohan and Sneha, thanks for the excellent spicy dinner) and SGEntrepreneurs (thanks Gwen), and incubators like Battle Venture (Jeffrey). I also met many entrepreneurs like Alvin, Danien, Joel, and Linda.

Generally I think Singapore’s situation is not an exception. They want to develop entrepreneurship and they see it is maybe one of the most important growth area  for the country.  They probably do much more than many other countries in this area, but they also have similar issues. It is not easy to get the startup funding market work well. We talked many times that all good entrepreneurs and ideas cannot be in Silicon Valley (I respect people and attitude there, but there are great people around the world). That’s why it would be so valuable to get the funding market to work better globally. These people shared our vision that it is possible to greate a “virtual Silicon Valley” in the Internet, when technology and globalization have enabled more international communities. These people also share that the vision that it is not only big institutions and organizations that enable new models. It is all people, it is crowd. We can change the world and funding market, if we really want.

This was our starting point in Singapore and I think you will hear much more about the cooperation of Singapore and Grow VC in the future. Now I go the other important Asian hub, Hong Kong.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Grow VC model in full detail

Friday, February 26th, 2010
Google Buzz

It’s now been 10 days since the launch of our community fund model and we have been following the market response very closely. Overall the feedback have been positive and supportive to what we are doing. So let me take this opportunity to personally thank all of you for your feedback and support.

The past 20 months or so, since coming up with the core idea for Grow VC crowdfunding model, it’s been quite a big push to get to this point. First, building up our great team and then starting to execute on the Grow VC strategy, by designing the service with all of it’s details and then actually build it – while at the same time working through all legal matters and building our overall company structures internationally. – I’m very proud of our team!

But whats really fun, is the fact that we are only getting started. – To us, we are now in the “Minimum Viable Product” stage and are looking forward to innovating and building our service even further with all of you.

In the past year or so, when we have talked about or core model with different people around the world – in person, we have learned that it takes some time to get the mind around all the details of our service. So I think now – 10 days after our community fund launch, is a good time to share more details about our service overall.

Outline of business model

Grow VC ServiceGrow VC offers a platform for investors and entrepreneurs to find one another, by registering to the Grow VC community online. One can assume one or several of four roles in the community, the roles of an individual, a funder, an entrepreneur or an expert. Each role come with related features available inside the service, to manage start-up fund raising process, related activities, communications and/or portfolio of start-ups. The subscription based membership fee is based on the profile or role of your choice and additional parameters (how much capital you want to raise for your start-up or what your investing budget is). The community then facilitates the matching process.

Members who pay subscription fee can assess, evaluate and comment start-ups and related details through transparent information in the community. Direct investments (angel investments) can also be made to start-ups with funder role. There is no fees in direct investments, since fees are only in subscriptions. Subscribed members are asked to suggest investment targets for the community fund out of the available start-ups in the community, for the value of 75 % of paid membership fee, e.g. 15 dollars if the membership fee is 20 dollars. This will serve as a viable peer-rating system, in order to ensure that everyone in the community has to evaluate start-ups also as any investor would. According to the start-ups success, the members will be rewarded based on the Grow VC rating system.

This unique model of Grow VC, helps entrepreneurs to start looking at other start-ups like investor and therefore make it easier to understand what type of information funders are looking for and what it takes to find interesting start-ups. In return this will help entrepreneurs to improve their own start-ups profile to make it more complete, understandable and interesting for other funding members.

At the same time this will in addition to paying for the full-features, each member also have an opportunity earn financial rewards for finding good investments for the community fund, regardless what happens with their other activities.

Different roles in the community

The person (free)
The most basic form of registration, currently free of charge, will allow you to access the community, participate on discussions inside the service and see information on a general level. For those looking to publish their start-up the free profile also allows to start building the start-up profile. The person profile is restricted from viewing in-depth person profiles and start-ups, and cannot participate in the actual entrepreneur – investor matching. Also, the person profile will not participate in the community fund functions. This profile is mainly intended for getting acquainted with the service and choosing a role in the Grow VC community.

The entrepreneur and the start-up
The entrepreneur profile is meant for those who register start-ups to the Grow VC community and start-ups are detailed profiles of these early ventures, containing relevant, accurate and detailed information about the start-up, e.g. business plans, growth projections, sensitivity analysis and so on.

There can be one or more entrepreneurs involved in one registered start-up. The entrepreneur profile is free of charge, but can only be created once you belong to a start-up profile. Entrepreneur profiles become active once the start-up profile is subscribed and published inside the service. Start-up profiles can include relevant information of the start-up, for investors and other experts to be able to review, evaluate and help improve the business operations. Entrepreneurs choose what information and in what detail they want to share with the community. Entrepreneurs can also invite other key people (like advisory board members) to be linked to their start-up profile for free.

There is always an ongoing dialog with the community, regarding development needs and things to consider in the start-up.
Start-ups are charged a membership rate according to the amount of capital they aim to raise out of Grow VC’s service.

The funder
Funders are private individuals, commonly called angel investors or partners of a venture capital firm. Funders seek out viable start-ups and make investment decisions based on their interest or expertise. The funder profiles are always represented by real people and in order to conduct direct investments, member that applies for funder role must confirm their legality and validity to become a funder, according to their corresponding legislation per Grow VC Terms Of Service.

Via Grow VC platform, funders can extend their deal flow beyond their own markets and enter more geographically syndicated investments. The membership charge of the funder profile is based on the investment budget of the funder.

The expert
The experts are professionals specializing in various activities within the Grow VC community, ensuring that the start-ups gain the support and guidance they may need to develop into successful new ventures. The experts provide professional services for start-up companies, such as legal counseling, incubation services, consultation etc.

The expert can be invited to join a start-up for free, in order to develop the start-up further and to bring credibility to the venture. If invited, they may participate and develop only the start-up that they were invited into, agreeing on terms with the start-up, granting some sort of return for the expert himself. The expert can also be utilized when managing investments, in strategic positions such as on the board of directors in start-ups, in order to ensure the supervision and support the start-up will need in order to maximize its potential of success.

With the paid expert profile, the expert may see all start-up profiles and participate in commenting and networking within the service, in order to promote the experts services and gain an extensive affiliation within the community. The paid expert profile grants a large role in the Grow VC community, developing the start-ups into profitable ventures.

Raising capital and funding start-ups

The peer-review system
As members pay the membership fee, 75 % of that fee is allocated for them as a budget from Grow VC community fund for fund to invest in any of the community’s start-ups. These micro investments are small by themselves, but as a whole they are of great importance and fuel the whole community. If, for any reason, that investment is not made, the capital will remain in the community fund for future investments.

These investment selections serve as a peer-review system for the community’s start-ups and since members are making these selection with Grow VC’s real money money with potential credit and rewards, they will pay attention to choosing the most promising start-up for community fund to invest in.

As the community proceeds with its selections, the most popular start-ups become of increasing importance and attention, even  for investors outside the community after they have undergone a process of scrutiny by the Grow VC community. This peer-review system of micro funding could result in a better success rate of start-ups and therefore a higher rate of return on investments, if the community is able to develop and pick out the most promising start-ups.

The three ways of investing in a start-up

Direct Investments
The Grow VC community allows those with membership profiles to view different start-ups, review and search out promising start-ups. Those with funder role may conduct a direct investment to the start-up. Actual deals are managed through one of the  the Grow VC certified partners.

If, for some reason at any time, the funder wants to cancel the investment, he or she may do so before the actual closing the deal is done via certified partner. All activity is show in the investment history of the users profile.

“Sweat Equity” investments
In addition to purely monetary investments, users with Expert role who possess expertise in some area of interest for the start-up, can invest their time, or sweat equity into a start-up. This investment can improve the credibility and attention of the start-up, as well as increase the likelihood of success and the pace of development of the business model and logic.

Even as this sweat equity investment is not in monetary terms, it may benefit both parties involved, as well as all the start-ups stakeholders, as the venture develops through and with right balance of experts and professionals.

Community fund investments
Community fund (that is owned and managed by Grow VC), makes it’s investments based only by the selections made by all subscribed members. Subscribed members may access, evaluate and comment the start-ups and then with their own budget of the community fund (equal to 75% of their paid membership fee) decide for community fund to invest in the most interesting start-up company. Actual investment by community fund are made by Grow VC and managed by Grow VC or via agreed third party (like expert, lead funder or certified partner)

Grow VC Core Process

Raising capital

When a start-up is created the entrepreneurs assign a target amount of capital for that start-up to raise. The entrepreneurs may attract investments to the start-up by providing extensive information about the start-up, e.g. business plan, projections or cash-flow analysis, by boosting credibility by involving professionals, e.g. consultants, lawyers or entrepreneurs with good track records and so on. The start-up may attract community members, who may choose to make direct investments, use their budget of the community fund or their own time and expertise depending on their role, or offer suggestions and comments in order to develop the venture further. There success of the start-up is up to the entrepreneurs.

Closing

When this target amount is reached, either through micro-investments by the community fund or through a combination of direct and micro-investments, the target start-up is then moved into closing proceeds to a third party where the actual deal is done and financial operations are conducted. Only then will the financial transactions take place. As the community fund investment is transferred to the start-up, Grow VC acquires a set percentage of ownership in the start-up company and an professional agreed by involved parties may take a board seat in the start-up.

Grow VC Deal Closing ProcessIf, for some reason, users back out and cancel their investment during the closing process, then the target amount of capital is no longer accomplished and the target start-up becomes open for investments once again.

ROI, community rewards and rating system

Grow VC RewardsSome start-ups will fail, losing all the invested capital, while others will be successful, generating a return on investment for the investors. Funders that have made direct investments with their own capital will get their own ROI directly. Return on investment made by Grow VC community fund investments will be divided in accordance to the Grow VC rating system, between the members who made the original community fund selections. Grow VC rating system ranks the members with a certain set of parameters, including, but not limited to the timing of the investment (e.g. first, among the first, the last to invest) and the relative amount of capital invested from their available budget. The members, who gain the best rating in accordance to this system, have earned a larger portion of the return than those who are rated lower according to this system.

The timing of the selection is determined by a set of parameters, ranking the member on how early on he or she was able to identify the successful start-up. The score decreases as the investor follows other members, motivating the individual members to seek out the promising start-ups as soon as possible and as efficiently as possible.

The relative amount of their budged used will be determined by a set of parameters, judging the members on the “gutsiness” of his or her selection, i.e. how much of the members budget was targeted in the start-up. This will serve as a rank rating the amount of “quality certainty” in the investment decisions, encouraging the members to conduct an extensive review of the start-ups, comment and help them develop their ventures.

Combining this rating system with the community reward will encourage funders, as well as other members, to seek out start-ups early on and conduct a thorough screening of the business plans, concepts and ventures in general. In addition to the community reward being distributed according to the rating system, the system itself becomes a sort of merit for community members. Grow VC may even encourage this process by awarding the highest rated members in the community with additional acknowledgment or prize at a certain time.

Values

Grow VC model is complemented by some fundamental values that bring credibility and conviction to the concept and business model. The core fundamental value is transparency. Transparency in the community and all operations will provide the community with a sense of trust in the system and a conviction of how things are conducted. As financial platforms online, especially in the investment community, value honesty and transparency, it is of utmost importance to provide these to the community, with e.g. transparent term sheets and community investments. When dealing in such a professional niche, it is perceived as most important to make clear the operating systems and ground rules of the community, also to provide the community enough transparency to be able to enforce rules on its own.

So there you have it in full detail. Let us know what do you think?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

What stage should Startup proposal be, to post it to Grow VC?

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010
Google Buzz
337/365: The Big Money
Image by DavidDMuir via Flickr

Now that the long awaited core model is out, we are working on collecting questions and feedback from various blogs, emails etc. and are going to write longer and more detailed post to answer all of the important questions, but just briefly wanted to share this one question I just replied via email.

I’d like to ask you at what level should be a Start up proposal? I mean, an entrepreneur should present a complete business plan or can present just an innovative idea too?

My reply:

It can be at in any stage that you want, but it will need to be web or mobile focused business idea/model. However it’s good to understand that typically very early stage ideas are not so interesting “as investment”, but then again that “typically” comes more from the “old models of investing” and to be honest we have no idea what will become “typical” in our service, because that depends on the users.

Also note that all information you post into your startup profile in our service, is visible to all paid members (and early beta registrants that have their active role/profile), so I suggest you to read this post related on “idea level”

This will be very interesting to see, if entrepreneurs as “investors” will be different than “traditional investors”.

It’s been a big push to get this concept build and thanks to our great team it’s now out. It feels so great to finally have it out in the real markets and get real feedback. Now we can finally start to be fully open about our service and can continue to develop our service openly with you.

There is a lot to do and we are just getting started with all of this, so please share your feedback and questions in comments so we can get the dialog going here :)

BIG thanks for each and every one of you for being part of this exiting journey with us!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

How Grow VC works with traditional VC’s

Monday, February 15th, 2010
Google Buzz

Grow VC was created to fill a gap in the startup funding. Nowadays VC’s focus on more mature companies, and friends and family networks and local business angels are not a solution for everyone and don’t always support international business in the best way. Grow VC is the solution for early phase (less than USD 1M) funding. Its micro-funding model also helps other parties to make investment decisions, and its community can support startups and investors in many ways, e.g. to find experts, legal help, auditors, and find answers from peer groups.

When Grow VC now launches its full service, it soon starts to work with the traditional Venture Capital companies. For example, VC’s can “outsource” their seed funding to Grow VC and avoid typical problems for this phase, i.e. large deal flow that is difficult to evaluate, high costs to manage investments, and higher risk. Community Investment model will be used in the co-investment decision-making, and the Expert pool helps to observe companies that have got investments. This also gives a pole position for these VC’s to make investments during the following rounds.

Grow VC will publish more details of the model during the next months. We have already agreed the first VC’s partners for this model and also look for some additional VC partners to get a good global coverage for the model. This model is a unique opportunity for startups to get to work with VC’s in an early phase, and for VC’s this is an important opportunity to really work with innovate startups globally.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

“everyone funding startups” – Grow VC’s community funding model is launched

Monday, February 15th, 2010
Google Buzz

fee_splitCrowdfunding becomes a reality for startups

15th of February 2010 – Hong Kong – Grow VC today launched its one long-awaited core business model, a community funding model. Under this model Grow VC will pool 75 per cent of membership fees into a community fund that gets invested back into promising member startups. Community fund investments are managed by Grow VC, but all investment decisions are made by Grow VC members who determine how to invest their portion of the fund to other startup companies that they feel have the most potential.

Grow VC is fixing the inefficiencies of private seed funding for web and mobile companies with a global social network and crowdfunding. The service includes the tools needed for building a startup from the ground up, to getting funding at the seed level. It introduces startups to investors, experts and other entrepreneurs, helping them discover common interests and providing new transparent ways of achieving investment.

The community-fund feature includes a members leaderboard based on the merit of the members’ investment decisions. The most successful decision makers will be financially rewarded when the community fund begins earning return on investment (ROI). All decisions are completely transparent so Grow VC members can always view how successful past and ongoing investments are.

Grow VC cofounder and CEO Valto Loikkanen said: “Our model gets startups acquainted with the entire investment process and we are the first to offer this type of peer-to-peer crowdfunding. For our service to have a sustainable future, the cost structure must be kept low and our own interests must clearly align with our members’ interests – so that our success is dependent on the success of other startups, investors and experts in our community.”

Grow VC cofounder and chairman Jouko Ahvenainen said: “Early phase funding requires new solutions. VC’s are moving their focus to more mature companies, and LP’s are decreasing investments in VC funds. Entrepreneurs want to have more competition and transparency in the funding market, and business angels require better tools to find good startups and for easier dealmaking. This new model opens totally new opportunities in funding, and it also offers practical help like transparent term sheets and investment agreements.”

More about the community funding model

The model encourages entrepreneurs to start looking at other startups from an investors’ point of view, helping them to improve their own profile and communication. Through their funding process in Grow VC, startups can also build a global, multilingual and geographically distributed network of industry peers of Grow VC members, motivated to support their venture.

For early stage investors, or “funders”, the information that the community decisions provide about noteworthy startups brings a level of transparency not seen before in investing in tech, web and mobile startups.

The patent-pending community fund model is the original core innovation in Grow VC’s arsenal of unique funding models and the reason behind Grow VC’s inception. In 2009 the company was also the first to announce a global service-investment model, whereby service providers in the industry can invest in companies using work resources as “sweat equity,” in addition to money.

Joining Grow VC, and the basic features such as building a person profile, are free. Premium features including the services above come with subscriptions ranging from $20 to $140 per month, depending on how much money the startup company is seeking or how much the investor is looking to invest. For unlimited service investments, the monthly subscription fee is $90 per month.

Following its first five months in public beta, Grow VC’s community just reached 700 registered users from within the startup and investment communities.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Welcome to The Year Of Tiger

Sunday, February 14th, 2010
Google Buzz
Chinese New Year Tiger
Image by Fuzzybunn via Flickr

Happy Chinese New Year!

The Year of the Tiger will bring far reaching changes for everyone. New inventions and incredible technological advances have a good chance of occurring. For all of the Chinese horoscope signs, this year is one to be active – seizing opportunities and making the most of our personal and very individual talents. Everything happens quickly and dramatically in a Tiger year – blink and you could miss an important chance of a lifetime!

This is the last day for claiming your free “premium account” for 2010 valued up to $1,200, that includes one or many of the following:

  • active startup profile (+ entrepreneur role)
  • expert role
  • funder role

Steps to claim your free “premium account” for 2010:

  1. Register
  2. After registration, complete your profile
  3. Go to the Subscription & Role page
  4. Select your subscription type
  5. Click “apply for subscription”


Tell a friend
Small things that you do can create great opportunities for you and people you care for. Let your friends know there’s only 1 day left to get their own free Grow VC premium subscription for 2010. You can even use your affiliate link if you like.
More details about the affiliate model

Good luck for the year of the Tiger!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

What is our market position?

Thursday, February 11th, 2010
Google Buzz
A social network diagram

Image via Wikipedia

Anytime a new player is entering the markets, there becomes a need to clarify “their market position”, ie. to try and figure out to “what box this belongs to”. Naturally this will be done by each individually, looking from their own perspective.

But, as we are about to launch our full-featured service, let me try to help and make this a bit easier for everyone and give some more insight to our own thinking about Grow VC market position.

Here’s what we are saying in our about page:

Grow VC is Venture Capital 2.0, bringing the first truly transparent, global, community-based approach to early stage funding. Grow VC can help mobile and web 2.0 startup stars secure initial funding for their businesses ranging from $10,000 to 1m USD. Grow VC will not only connect startup entrepreneurs with ‘funders’ (investors) to help them discover their common interests, but also provide tools for the process and new transparent ways of doing things.

Let’s talk this in more detail:

GrowVC_bgVenture Capital 2.0

This is pointing to where we started our journey. The big talk about the “Venture Capital is Broken“, the talk that the old models of Venture Capital don’t work for new business models. Therefore new business models need new funding models. Following the Web 2.0 model of communicating this we started to talk about Venture Capital 2.0

Truly transparent

This a big part of the the Web 2.0 and social networks. Things that were impossible to think of being public information in just 5 years ago are becoming public by default. To us, it’s only natural that this development will eventually catch up in a big way also in Business and funding startups are not going to be any different. Simply because there are much more problems involved with stuff that is non public information, if compared to being more open. Therefore, in our service, most of the things inside are transparent to everyone.

Global

When we talk about global we mean GLOBAL. We are not talking about “that thing” where you look outside from your own country – No. To us the global is being present in global community that lives at least part of their life online, where things are becoming more global than ever before. Because of the social networks people are really making the Internet “the only true global place in the world”.

Early stage funding

So, our position is not where there are working solutions available and adding efficiency to that would have very little impact, aka traditional Venture Capital. There where the need is several millions and where the cost and management structures are higher. Early stage is the segment where most of the problems of today are. Because of the new entrepreneurs entering to markets that are still learning the ways of startup funding and where the cost of managing, communicating etc. are high, but where also the new stratups are born.

For Mobile and Web  Startups

At least for now, we are focusing solely to web and mobile startups. The reason for this is that,

  • those offer some of the most interesting business (and therefore investing) opportunities
  • traditional VC don’t really fit to these in their very early stages
  • most of the Web & Mobile startup founders and investors are already living the “online life” and their footprints can be found around the web.
  • like ecommerce started from computer parts and grew from there we believe that new funding models for startups have best potential to start from web & mobile related startups.

$10,000 to $1,000,000 (that’s USD)

Yep, we even put a number to give a clear range to “seed funding” in our platform. It will be interesting to see what will become the real levels in the beginning and to where those will develop as time goes by.

Provide tools for the process

Now that we have outlined our market position, this is the actual part of what we are doing. Our first step is to move the seed funding process to online platform and provide needed tools to manage the process overall – and for each role to have their own tools for what they are doing in our platform.

Once we have moved the process online, we can continue to innovate and build new and better tools to get the process faster, easier and more efficient for everyone involved. Step by step.

So there you have our market position in more detail. After our launch we may need to add some points to this about our core feature, but most of it will remain the same.

Future position and cooperating with others

Naturally this is just our starting point and only the future will show, to what direction and how fast we need to develop our service.

Our position also leaves plenty of stuff around us that we can’t or won’t focus and we are more than happy to work together with everyone in the startup ecosystem to cooperate on all the things that help new startups. Some our own cooperating ideas we have already outlined, some are still just ideas and most likely, the best ideas will come from you!

So – we build and provide new tools and information to add efficiency and to make things happen faster, make stuff easier to understand and bring down the related costs while doing them. But while doing all that, we are going to only focus to the core problem of the funding process and look to cooperate with others on the related matters. So we look forward to join forces with accelerators, incubators, mentor programs, startup events, localized platforms etc., since our plan is not to star competing with things that are already working, but to develop things that make even those easier to manage and more productive for everyone.

We hope this “more detailed positioning” helps everyone to see “the box we fit” more clearly.

If you are working with startups and have an idea to cooperate with us, please contact us. We are happy to go through your  ideas and see if we can cooperate on those with you.

For those Venture Capitalist that are interested in the startups in our market position – Jouko, my co-founder will soon post about our plans in this area. – Meanwhile, stay tuned or contact him directly.

What do you think of our market position? How would you like us to evolve?


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

iPad and Apps Economy

Thursday, January 28th, 2010
Google Buzz

We all now know officially that Apple launched iPad. It is an interesting new concept between mobile phones and laptops. And definitely it will have and need a lot of applications to be successful. We saw already some games, books, and newspapers that are available.

iPadThe next step is to get developers to make much more apps. Paul Grim, a General Partner at venture capital firm SunBridge Partners, commented the apps business from the traditional VC point of view in Venturebeat’s article, An investor’s take on the iPad — how to parse the hype. In this article Paul Grim says:

Although I do believe there will be many successful apps on the iPad, I don’t believe they are generally venture-backed material. As with most of the iPhone apps, this will be a hits-driven business with little capital intensity; most of the successes will likely be angel or self-funded.”

This is the same point Grow VC has emphasized many times (like yesterday). We have actually divided the mobile startups now into two main categories (there are of course much more segments inside these categories):

  1. Hardware and more demanding technical platform startups
  2. Application startups

The first category includes companies that have been funded by traditional VC’s. But many of those firms also need seed funding before a VC round. The second category is not really for the traditional VC’s. But it doesn’t mean that they are not good business opportunities. But the capital structure and risk profile is different from VC’s targets. They can start with small money, and it is not technology risk, but much more market risk, i.e. can they really get loyal users.

This is one reason, why new models for seed and startup funding are needed. And we believe Grow VC’s concepts, which we have now in beta and especially new ones we launch in this year, will offer a new way to fund these companies.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Future of Venture Capital

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010
Google Buzz
Silhouettes representing healthy, overweight, ...

Image via Wikipedia

Today I was reading one of my favorite VC blogs AVC by Fred Wilson about “The Venture Diet is Working“, where he says:

2010 will be an interesting year. If VC investments go back up to $25bn to $30bn per year, then the diet didn’t stick and we are back to an overfunded industry that will produce subpar returns on average.

If, on the other hand, the new normal is $15bn to $20bn per year, then the diet worked and we’ve scaled back the business to healthy levels.

This comment relates to he’s earlier post about the “Venture Capital Math Problem“, where he explains about the problem that – too much money will make the whole VC industry to under perform.

As this is one of the reasons we have started Grow VC, I wanted to point out that things are not the same everywhere. So here’s my take on the topic:

I think this is similar problem than it is with food. In some western countries there is too much food and problems that are associated with that, like obesity. Yet in many parts of the world, people are starving.

So if some markets in the world have too much money in VC, it does not mean there is too much money overall, it’s just wrongly distributed. I do understand that, there are also problems with having too much money per sector, so that nobody is getting good results, but that too is wrong distribution.

Early VC money should always be going towards new innovation and not to be “me too in the popular segment” – there are plenty of problems in the world for entrepreneurs to solve & VC’s to be successful.

If we think that “Four Years After Founding, Kiva Hits $100 Million In Microloans“, I feel that it’s a strong indication that entrepreneurship in all shape and sizes can be instrumental on reshaping our world for the better.

There is a big gap between what Kiva.org is doing and with these problems of having too much money in venture capital in some regions. For us this shows that there needs to be much better distribution, more transparency and more activity in this segment overall – and this is exactly where we are focusing our efforts.

Here’s my dialog with Fred, on the “Venture Capital Math problem” 8 months ago:

Me:

I think this just shows that money does not solve problems. The problem here is not too much money, but how it’s now distributed.

VC industry is starting to look like the newspaper industry ;) – better to wake up, the blogs are coming…

Fred:

What are the blogs of the VC business?Things like Y Combinator are great but they are feeding us even more opportunities so I see them as additive, Although I also see blogs as additive for the newspaper business if they’d just see themselves as curators and aggregators instead of content creators

Me:

I guess the closest thing to “blogs of VC industry” today are angel investors. But that’s for today. Also Y-combinator and the likes are great too and could be considered as “blogs of VC industry”. However their “next step” need to change away from just VC’s.

The fundamental change will become, when there are “platforms” for anyone to start a “blog for VC industry” and that’s what we are doing in www.growvc.com.

Overall, we feel that in long term the money will be spread to more potential start-ups and more of them will not go via IPO but just buy back of shares, mergers etc. with lower ROI. But that’s OK if the time for ROI is shorter and cost of management is lower.

So – be more direct, spread wider, lower the management cost, speed up the ROI cycle and you can accept lower ROI.

If you think about the structure of today, from where the VC money really comes from, you start to see the “big picture”. – basically it means that individuals like you and me pay for pensions funds etc. and these funds then invest to VC funds. VC’s then make investment decisions and “manage” the investments, all the way to take it public (hopefully). Basically just to sell it back to us…

When more people will start to understand this cycle because of more info and transparency online (if they are interested), people will not accept this structure. Because in the long run what matter is, if the companies in question sell what matters. And that is not a question of size.

Fred:

Got it
I hope this works
It would scale much better

Related to this topic, below is a very interesting speech given by Fred Wilson at talks@google. You need to spare an hour to look the whole video, but I feel it’s well worth it. Just have some popcorn & coke and relax.

What makes it interesting to me, is that those industries that are going to be disrupted by internet in the future, currently have same issues what Venture Capital does, yet for some reason those would not apply to VC industry.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark