Grow VC logo



Archive for January, 2009

Forbes: “Entrepreneurs and venture capitalists need to bridge their gaps”
Friday, January 30th, 2009
Google Buzz

Forbes writes about the same issue, why we are working with Grow VC. The key issue is to get right people to find each other. And there must not be artificial barriers or filters. It doesn’t really matter whether we talk about biotech, semiconductors, or web 2.0. And if all investments are controlled by few business angels who understand the business they have done earlier or VC’s with some Excel experts, it is not enough for all innovations and start-ups. I don’t say that there is anything wrong with top level business angels or VC’s, I just say it cannot be the only solution.

  • Share/Bookmark
Breaking Through The Broken
Thursday, January 29th, 2009
Google Buzz

grow heroFew days back I got an email from Chris Mottau at North Venture Partners. In his email he says that “he feels, we share the same vision” and that he became very excited about what we do;  “I love the mojo of your blog” – in his words.

He also wanted to share their new guidebook called Breaking Through The Broken: The Transparent Guide To Overcoming The Inefficiencies In Early Stage Venture Capital. -saying that he thinks I will like it.

Sure enough, I really did. It’s well written, up to date, quality piece (33 page of reading) and it’s really good overall view to current funding climate and to various problems that exists. What I really like about it personally, is that it does covers many of the latest and new emerging services that are trying to help change things in these currently broken models of early stage funding.

I asked if I can highlight some of my favorites from this piece in our blog and he said: “I’m glad you enjoyed the document, feel free to share it on your blog…it represents a good deal of work for us of which we are very proud”.

So here are some of my personal favorites:

Early stage investing will always be considered a high risk, high reward game. But what if there were smarter, more efficient tools that enabled both investors and entrepreneurs to optimize the process by making the investment process “less gut” and “more guided”? Could we eliminate some of the fear and confusion surrounding early stage investing and begin to truly optimize entrepreneurship?

————

This all raises the question; what is the early stage investor community currently doing to optimize entrepreneurship and increase the success rate of their investments?

————

On one side there are the mysterious “deal makers” who might seem easy to reach with the click of a mouse, but in reality are incredibly difficult to engage with meaningful dialogue. On the flip side, there are the passionate entrepreneurs who are eager to find out what an experienced investor thinks of their “big idea,” but usually hear back nothing at all after submitting their materials for consideration.

————

Start-ups are now cheaper to launch than ever before, as $500K has become the new $5 million. Primarily because basic software that was once absurdly expensive is now free (open source), and astonishingly good hardware (or virtual processing power) is now very affordable.

————

To change our future we need to re-think the past. Moving forward into  an era of collaboration and transparency isn’t just a nice idea; right now it’s an imperative.

————

The cold fact is that most investors still won’t even glance at a business plan unless it’s gotten a referral from a credible third party. It’s not only about who you know, it’s also about how you know them. Entrepreneurs and business plans referred by others who have proven to be good filters for garbage ideas, often float to the top of the pile. How else do you expect investors to filter through 34 years of reading material? Everything else usually gets dumped into the circular filing cabinet. Today most investment deals come down to personal TRUST, which is pretty hard to create in a virtual world.

————

“The real issue is that getting financing is difficult and inefficient for the investor. I’m having to create a whole slew of personal relationships, networking, etc… – just to get small amounts of money. While I like being social and getting out there, it’s slow. We need a Wal-Mart model for “common’ money” (i.e. under $500k using a typical business model). The real issue is that many people could be funded so much more efficiently, with better returns, if the industry was more transparent.” – Adam Nelson, Founder of varud.com

———–

“With Angelsoft, all of the personal aspects of Angel investing seem to be removed from the equation. My materials are submitted through Angelsoft forms, and then disappear into some system that encourages a group of busy angels to evaluate the opportunity in a black box. Do they like it? Do they hate it? Do they even read it? I have no idea, since I have never heard anything!” – comments a disappointed entrepreneur.

———–

Remember, investors (like Hollywood studio executives) see and hear of thousands of deals a year and have very little time to spend on them. If your idea doesn’t fit into their “box of knowledge”, it’s going to be quite difficult to break through and earn a second meeting. If you can’t narrow down your business to a sticky single sentence, you’re probably not ready to get in front of an investor anyway.

———–

Paul Graham, a prominent Silicon Valley entrepreneur and Angel investor sums up the feeling of many entrepreneurs when he said, “VCs that suck less are all about disclosure and transparency.” To truly produce fundamental change and foster innovation it’s time for investors to allow entrepreneurs to see the world from their side of the table.

———–

Note: one other insight that can be pulled from the real estate market is the standardization of deal documents and terms. The liquidity of real estate hinges upon the simplicity of the standardized paperwork. Just imagine the efficiencies that could be gained from standardized deal terms in early stage venture investing.

Like said these are just some of my favorites from this great guidebook. Make sure to read the whole “Breaking Through The Broken: The Transparent Guide To Overcoming The Inefficiencies In Early Stage Venture Capital.” It’s really worth it. And please, make sure you let us know how you like it.

Thanks Chris for sharing this.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark
Social lending – new finance models are doing well
Wednesday, January 28th, 2009
Google Buzz

Zopa.com is a social lending service and kiva.org is a micro-loan service. At last weekend many British newspapers wrote about Zopa. Now when all banks have a lot of bad loans, Zopa has done very well. And it seems to be a surprise for many traditional finance sector people that Zopa has very few bad loans. Independent writes “Andrew Hagger, from the financial advice website Moneynet.co.uk, admits that when Zopa was launched, he had misgivings. These, he says, have eased over time. ‘I was worried about the possibility of savers losing out due to borrowers defaulting, but after three years there is no sign of this. The key is that, through precise credit scoring, Zopa does tend to be careful over who gets the loans.’”

Independent summarizes “On the other side of the coin, borrowers have seen credit-card, loan and overdraft rates rise as banks grow ever more reluctant to lend. Even people with a good credit history are being charged more or refused a loan altogether. Against this backdrop, any initiative that offers to cut out the banks is bound to appeal. This is where Zopa.com, the money-exchange website, fits in. It styles itself as a market offering ‘loans from people, not banks’. Basically, it matches individuals with cash to lend to individuals looking to borrow.”

Zopa.com and kiva.org are good examples, how new kind of finance and funding concepts can work in the Internet. They are social, they are open and transparent, and they are for longtail. There are still a lot of people who are skeptical, whether this kind of models can really change finance models and business. But we start to have enough evidences that at least these new models have demand and space to grow. And the current crisis of financial institutions will accelerate the growth of new models.


  • Share/Bookmark
Business Angels – Part 2
Wednesday, January 14th, 2009
Google Buzz

It is typical to think that there is a shortage of money, and a lot of companies are looking for money, and investors can choose companies they want to invest in. But it is not the full story. Actually there are a lot of private investors that are willing to make investments in start-up companies, but they have often very limited deal flow. It easily also means their investment decisions are not so good always. They invest in companies they happen to find. And when companies also might have the same situation, the match is not always the best possible.

Investors want to evaluate companies. They want to see track record, core team CV’s, financial performance, and make a due diligence.  But how often companies and entrepreneurs can evaluate investors in the same way. I know business angels that really can be a problem for companies, and they have already caused troubles (e.g. by being besserwissers, trying companies to support their personal interests, or bringing their own friends to companies), but always they seem to find new entrepreneurs who need money. And after a year or two entrepreneurs want to get rid of these people.

What could we do to avoid these issues? At least large deal flow for investors is important. And entrepreneurs need channels to find more investors and get information from investors. So, we can say we need a market place, more information, and transparency.

  • Share/Bookmark
Who are business angels – how to make angel investing work better
Tuesday, January 6th, 2009
Google Buzz

Scott Shane has written an excellent book about angel investing: Fool’s Gold, The Truth Behind Angel Investing in America. It is the best and most fact oriented book I have seen about the angel investing. Many finding are really revealing. They are from the US, but based on my own expriences I believe results would be similar in Europe and Asia too. For example, actually business angels look very different from the way that they are described in the media. The typical business angel is less wealthy, less well-educated, younger, and less likely to be retired that suggested by the stereotypical description of angels. For example, the wealth statistics are interesting, 2/3 of the angels have less than $1 Million net worth. It very much indicating that almost anyone can be a business angel.

The book also list many different reasons to invest:
1. To Make Money
2. To Get Involved with Private Companies
3. To Learn New Things
4. As a Hobby Job
5. To Find a Job
6. To Help the Community
7. Because a Friend of a Friend Has a Business

I recommend this book to every one who wants to make angel investments or entrepreneurs who look for angel investors. This book also gives many concrete ideas, how to develop angel investing. Angels can be an important source of money for many companies, and the total value of annual angel investments is greater than VC investments. But angel investments could be even more important funding source, but all players like entrepreneurs, angels, banks, VC’’s and policy makers should better understand facts of angel investing.

My conclusion was that more open market place, better deal flow, better transparency (to know companies but also investors better), and opportunities to co-invest with other angels are important areas to make angel investing work better. Angel investment market today is not effective (i.e. not enough transparency, no open deal flow, high transaction costs) and by making it more effective, we can make it much more significant.

  • Share/Bookmark
2009 Trends
Thursday, January 1st, 2009
Google Buzz

It is again time to predict the new year. Wired has listed some technology trends for 2009. American National Venture Capital Association has predicted 2009 VC environment. Their approach is of course very much based on the traditional VC model. I think we can all agree that 2009 will be difficult year to get VC funding. But at the same time many entrepreneurs continue with their business ideas, many people lose their job and at least some of them have excellent ideas to create new business, and they have also learned how to make things in a better and more effective way. Internet and Mobile services are developing rapidly, and I believe this kind of environment really boost 2.0 services. So, definitely a challenge for these entrepreneurs is to get funding, not so much, but let’s say 50k to 300k to get service up and run and survive somehow.

I think this is the challenge that all of us, entrepreneurs, private investors, and people who want to be involved in new businesses, must tackle together in 2009. We must work together to find models that people who want to create new can find new models to work and also get funding. This is one key mission for Grow VC in this year, but this is something all of us must do together. We are a community that learn together and find new ways to do things. Definitely a part of this process is that Grow VC service for funding will be launched in this year.

  • Share/Bookmark